Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613846›Full record

SynthesisArchives of women's mental health2020

Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety in pregnant women. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of women's views on the acceptability of and satisfaction with interventions.

Kerry Evans, Helen Spiby, Jane C Morrell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of women's mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06750406 (Effects of Mind Body Exercises on Stress, Anxiety and Fatigue in Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06750406 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Mind Body Exercises on Stress, Anxiety and Fatigue in Pregnant Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled34ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmsmind body exercises, relaxation exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Responses to increased rates of caesarean births.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Assessing mental health among students in the UAE: A cross-sectional study utilizing the DASS-21 scale.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kerry EvansSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, 12th Floor Tower Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Kerry.evans1@nottingham.ac.uk.
Helen SpibySchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, 12th Floor Tower Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Jane C MorrellSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, 12th Floor Tower Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess women's views on the acceptability of and satisfaction with non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the symptoms of anxiety in pregnant women. A systematic review and narrative synthesis (Prospero protocol number CRD42015017841). Fourteen included studies were conducted in Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, UK and USA. Interventions were cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness, yoga, psychological assessment, supportive and educational based interventions. Studies included women from general antenatal populations and women with anxiety or depression symptoms or risk factors for anxiety or depression. The findings were limited due to the small number of studies evaluating different types of interventions using various study methods. Some studies had too little procedural reporting to allow a full quality assessment. Women's views on the acceptability of and satisfaction with interventions were overwhelmingly positive. The review highlights women's motivations for and barriers to participation as well as the benefit women perceived from peer support and individual discussions of their situation. Interventions need to be further evaluated in randomised controlled trials. The inclusion of women's views and experiences illuminates how and why intervention components contribute to outcomes. Women's initial concerns about psychological screening and the benefit derived from peer support and individual discussion should be noted by providers of maternity care.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMindfulnessNarrationPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleYogaAntenatalAnxietyInterventionPregnancySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30613846
PMCPMC6987064
OpenAlexW2909062424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.