Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613799›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2017

Point-of-contact interactive record linkage (PIRL) between demographic surveillance and health facility data in rural Tanzania.

Christopher T Rentsch, Georges Reniers, Chodziwadziwa Kabudula, Richard Machemba, Baltazar Mtenga, Katie Harron, Paul Mee, Denna Michael, Redempta Natalis, Mark Urassa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Value Proposition of Coordinated Population Cohorts Across Africa.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher T RentschDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Georges ReniersDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Chodziwadziwa KabudulaMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Richard MachembaThe Tazama Project, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Baltazar MtengaThe Tazama Project, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Katie HarronDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Paul MeeMeSH Consortium, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Denna MichaelThe Tazama Project, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Redempta NatalisDistrict Medical Officer, Magu District, Tanzania.
Mark UrassaThe Tazama Project, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Jim ToddDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Basia ZabaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 103975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth and demographic surveillance systems (HDSS) have been an invaluable resource for monitoring the health status of populations, but often contain self-reported health service utilisation, which are subject to reporting bias.

objectiveTo implement point-of-contact interactive record linkage (PIRL) between demographic and health facility systems data, characterise attributes associated with (un)successful record linkage, and compare findings with a fully automated retrospective linkage approach.

methodsIndividuals visiting the Kisesa Health Centre were matched to their HDSS records during a short up-take interview in the waiting area of the health facility. The search algorithm was used to rank potential matches, from which the true match(es) were selected after consultation with the patient. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with being matched to an HDSS record. Records matched based on respondent's clarifications were subsequently used as the gold-standard to evaluate fully automated retrospective record linkage by calculating sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV).

resultsAmong 2,624 individuals who reportedly lived in the HDSS coverage area, we matched 2,206 (84.1%) to their HDSS records. Characteristics associated with a higher odds of being matched were increased age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02, 1.12; per 5-year increment), a later consent into the study (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.37, 3.12; in the most recent six-month period), and fieldworker level of experience. The main drivers of the linkage algorithm were name, sex, year of birth, village, sub-village, and household member name. At the lowest match score threshold, automated retrospective linkage would have only correctly identified and linked 55% (1440/2612) of the records with a PPV of 55% (1440/2612).

conclusionWhere resources are available, PIRL is a viable approach to link HDSS and other administrative data sources that outperforms purely retrospective approaches.

Indexed as

data linkagehealth and demographic surveillance systemshealth facilitypoint-of-contact interactive record linkagesub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID30613799
PMCPMC6314455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.