Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613798›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2018

Horizon scanning implanted biosensors in personalising breast cancer management: First pilot study of breast cancer patients views.

Theresa Ikegwuonu, Gill Haddow, Joyce Tait, Alan F Murray, Ian H Kunkler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa IkegwuonuInnogen Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Gill HaddowScience, Technology and Innovation Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Joyce TaitInnogen Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Alan F MurrayInstitute for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Ian H KunklerEdinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetic and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.
University of Edinburgh · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018040/1Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/15Wellcome Trust 100561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to explore breast cancer patients' understanding and acceptability of implanted biosensors (BS) within the primary tumour to personalise adjuvant radiotherapy, and to determine optimal design and number of BS, and evaluate potential clinical benefits as well as concerns about tolerance, toxicity, dwell time, and confidentiality of data. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 32 patients treated by surgery (29 breast conserving, 3 mastectomy), postoperative radiotherapy and systemic therapy for early breast cancer, were recruited from a posttreatment radiotherapy clinic at a cancer centre. Patients participated in semistructured interviews. Interview transcripts were analysed using qualitative methods.

resultsParticipants were aged 39 to 87 years, with a median age of 62 years. Most (N = 23[72%]) were unfamiliar with biosensors. The majority (N = 29[90.6%]) were supportive of the technology's potential use in future breast cancer treatment and were willing to accept biosensors (N = 28[88%]) if they were endorsed by their breast cancer consultant. Only 3 patients expressed concerns, predominantly about uncertainties on their role in the diagnostic and treatment pathway. Patients were flexible about the size and shape of BS, but had a preference for small size (N = 28 [87.5%]). Most (N = 22[69%]) would accept implantation of more than 5 BS and were flexible (N = 22[69%]) about indefinite dwell time. Patients had a strong preference for wireless powering of the BS (N = 28[87.5%]). Few had concerns about loss of confidentiality of data collected. All patients considered biosensors to be potentially of important clinical benefit.

conclusionsWhile knowledge of biosensors was limited, patients were generally supportive of biosensors implanted within the primary tumour to collect data that might personalise and improve breast cancer radiotherapy in future.

Indexed as

adjuvant radiotherapybiosensorbreast cancercancerimplantable technologyoncologypatient acceptability

Identifiers

PMID30613798
PMCPMC6266376
OpenAlexW2792952017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.