ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care
Comparing the effects of face-to-face and telenursing education on the quality of family caregivers caring in patients with cancer.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Designing a need-based program for relieving psychological distress of family caregivers of leukemia patients: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Trial
- Article
- Effects of attending and telenursing interventions on caring burden in family caregivers of hemodialysis patients: A comparative study in Iran.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Exploring Public Perceptions of Telenursing: A Q Methodology Study.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Comparison of palliative care education for family caregivers in high-and-low-income countries: An integrative review.Belitung nursing journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTaking care of patients with cancer is often done at home and by family caregivers. However, these groups do not receive the necessary education regarding care at home.
objectivesThe present study aimed to compare the effects of face-to-face and telenursing training methods on the quality of services provided by the family caregiver for patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 103 family caregivers of patients with cancer were randomly divided into 3 groups: control (
resultsAfter intervention, the average total quality score for the care of patients in face-to-face (166.13 ± 13.91) and telenursing (157.76 ± 17.24) groups was significantly higher than the control group (82.51 ± 16.84) (
conclusionThe results of the study showed that the two methods of training were effective on the quality of care among family caregivers of patients with cancer to a similar extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.