Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613411›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Cardiovascular drugs attenuated myocardial resistance against ischaemia-induced and reperfusion-induced injury in a rat model of repetitive occlusion.

Nora Gatzke, Nadija Güc, Philipp Hillmeister, André Dülsner, Ferdinand Le Noble, Eva Elina Buschmann, Maja Ingwersen, Peter Bramlage, Ivo R Buschmann

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cardioprotective effects of sinomenine in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rat model.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  2. ArrhythmoGenoPharmacoTherapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nora GatzkeDepartment for Angiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Campus Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg, Germany.
Nadija GücDepartment of Cardiology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Virchow, Center for Cardiovascular Research (CCR) Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Philipp HillmeisterDepartment for Angiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Campus Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg, Germany.
André DülsnerDepartment of Cardiology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Virchow, Center for Cardiovascular Research (CCR) Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Ferdinand Le NobleDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology & Institute for Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Eva Elina BuschmannDepartment for Angiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Campus Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg, Germany.
Maja IngwersenInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg, Germany.
Peter BramlageDepartment for Angiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Campus Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4970-2110
Ivo R BuschmannDepartment for Angiology, Brandenburg Medical School, Campus Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEIPPMed (Germany) · DEKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the impact of cardioprotective drugs on ST-elevation, arrhythmias and infarct size in a rat model of repetitive coronary artery occlusion. Methods: Seventy Sprague-Dawley rats were randomised to two control and five treatment groups. Placebo was either implantation of a pneumatic occluder onto the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) without starting repetitive occlusion (SHAM) or subsequent RO of the LAD over 10 days without medication (ROP). Treatment groups underwent RO and additionally received nitroglycerin (NTG), metoprolol, verapamil (VER), ranolazine (RAN) or candesartan (CAN). Two weeks after the intervention, rats underwent a single, sustained LAD occlusion followed by reperfusion. To evaluate differences in cardiac resistance against myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion injury, cardiac surrogate parameters including maximal ST-elevation, arrhythmias and infarct size were assessed. Results: Compared with sham, RO alone and RO plus nitroglycerin were associated with significantly lower maximal ST-elevation and percentage of infarcted myocardium (SHAM 0.12 mV, ROP 0.06 mV (p=0.004), NTG 0.05 mV (p=0.005); SHAM 16.2%, ROP 6.6% (p=0.008), NTG 5.9% (p=0.006). Compared with RO alone, RO plus RAN was accompanied by increased ST-elevation (0.13 mV, p=0.018) and RO plusVER or CAN by more infarcted myocardium (14.2%, p=0.004% and 15.5%, p=0.003, respectively). Rats treated with VER, RAN or CAN tended to severe arrhythmias more frequently than those of the control groups. Conclusions: RO led to an increased myocardial resistance against ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Concomitant administration of nitroglycerin did not affect the efficacy of RO. Cardiovascular channel or receptor blockers reduced the efficacy of RO.

Indexed as

angiotensin II receptor blockersarteriogenesisbeta-blockerscalcium channel blockerscollateral circulationcoronary artery diseaseischemic preconditioningmyocardial infarctionmyocardial ischemianitroglycerineranolazinereperfusion injury

Identifiers

PMID30613411
PMCPMC6307560
OpenAlexW2902449734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.