Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613387›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Out of sight, out of mind? Germ cells and the potential impacts of epigenomic drugs.

Ellen G Jarred, Heidi Bildsoe, Patrick S Western

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Epigenetics of Male Infertility: The Role of DNA Methylation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Innate Immune Memory in Macrophages.Newborn (Clarksville, Md.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen G JarredCentre for Reproductive Health, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Heidi BildsoeCentre for Reproductive Health, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Patrick S WesternCentre for Reproductive Health, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7587-8227
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, determine the way DNA is packaged within the nucleus and regulate cell-specific gene expression. The heritability of these modifications provides a memory of cell identity and function. Common dysregulation of epigenetic modifications in cancer has driven substantial interest in the development of epigenetic modifying drugs. Although these drugs have the potential to be highly beneficial for patients, they act systemically and may have "off-target" effects in other cells such as the patients' sperm or eggs. This review discusses the potential for epigenomic drugs to impact on the germline epigenome and subsequent offspring and aims to foster further examination into the possible effects of these drugs on gametes. Ultimately, the information gained by further research may improve the clinical guidelines for the use of such drugs in patients of reproductive age.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEpigenomicsGerm CellsHistone CodeHumansReproductioncancerdevelopmentepigeneticgermlineinheritancepharmacologyreproduction

Identifiers

PMID30613387
PMCPMC6305226
OpenAlexW2905988529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.