Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613382›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Oscillations and Spike Entrainment.

Charles J Wilson, Matthew H Higgs, DeNard V Simmons, Juan C Morales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tremor pathophysiology.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Propagation of Oscillations in the Indirect Pathway of the Basal Ganglia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charles J WilsonDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-2145
Matthew H HiggsDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA.
DeNard V SimmonsDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA.
Juan C MoralesDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA.

Funding

UTSA RISE Research Training ProgramR25GM060655 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI BAREA-RODRIGUEZ, EDWIN J · 2000 to 2022
$21.6M
Oscillations and Resonance in Basal Ganglia CircuitsR35NS097185 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI WILSON, CHARLES J · 2017 to 2024
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060655NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oscillatory input to networks, as indicated by field potentials, must entrain neuronal firing to be a causal agent in brain activity. Even when the oscillatory input is prominent, entrainment of firing is not a foregone conclusion but depends on the intrinsic dynamics of the postsynaptic neurons, including cell type-specific resonances, and background firing rates. Within any local network of neurons, only a subset of neurons may have their firing entrained by an oscillating synaptic input, and oscillations of different frequency may engage separate subsets of neurons.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalNeuronsOscillometryLFPoscillationphase-locking

Identifiers

PMID30613382
PMCPMC6305216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.