ArticlePhytochemistry letters2018
Non-Destructive Chemical Analysis of a
Article in Phytochemistry letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The continuing need for taxonomic input in phytochemical research.Journal of ethnopharmacology · 2026Review
- Ethnobotany and the Role of Plant Natural Products in Antibiotic Drug Discovery.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- Valorization of mangosteen, "The Queen of Fruits," and new advances in postharvest and in food and engineering applications: A review.Journal of advanced research · 2019Review
- Biodiversity of Convolvulaceous species that contain Ergot Alkaloids, Indole Diterpene Alkaloids, and Swainsonine.Biochemical systematics and ecology · 2019Article
- Droplet probe: coupling chromatography to the in situ evaluation of the chemistry of nature.Natural product reports · 2019Review
- Potential Anticancer Agents Characterized from Selected Tropical Plants.Journal of natural products · 2019Review
- Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids (MAAs) in Time-Series of Lichen Specimens from Natural History Collections.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herbarium voucher specimens are used primarily for taxonomic confirmation. However, they also afford a record of the metabolic profile of a plant, potentially at the time it was collected, or at the very least, at the time of analysis. Even with the enhanced sensitivity of modern analytical techniques, analysis of the metabolites of a herbarium voucher requires removal and consumption of at least part of an entire specimen. We present herein a non-destructive method to analyze the metabolites of herbarium voucher specimens with the droplet-liquid microjunction-surface sampling probe (droplet probe) coupled to ultra-performance liquid chromatography and highresolution mass spectrometry. As proof of concept, a herbarium voucher specimen of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.