Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613294›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2018

Multimodal analysis of aged wild-type mice exposed to repeated scanning ultrasound treatments demonstrates long-term safety.

Daniel G Blackmore, Fabrice Turpin, Abdalla Z Mohamed, Fangrong Zong, Rucha Pandit, Matthew Pelekanos, Fatima Nasrallah, Pankaj Sah, Perry F Bartlett, Jürgen Götz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Secondary effects on brain physiology caused by focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel G BlackmoreClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Fabrice TurpinQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Abdalla Z MohamedQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Fangrong ZongQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Rucha PanditClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Matthew PelekanosClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Fatima NasrallahQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Pankaj SahQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Perry F BartlettClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Jürgen GötzClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUPark Centre for Mental Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier presents a major challenge for the delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain; however, it can be transiently opened by combining low intensity ultrasound with microbubble infusion. Studies evaluating this technology have largely been performed in rodents, including models of neurological conditions. However, despite promising outcomes in terms of drug delivery and the amelioration of neurological impairments, the potential for long-term adverse effects presents a major concern in the context of clinical applications.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBrainFemaleHippocampusMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMultimodal ImagingSpatial MemoryTime FactorsUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonographyactive place avoidance testblood-brain barrierdiffusion tensor imagingfocused ultrasoundlong-term potentiation

Identifiers

PMID30613294
PMCPMC6299703
OpenAlexW2902125548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.