Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613161›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2019

Naldemedine in Japanese patients with opioid-induced constipation and chronic noncancer pain: open-label Phase III studies.

Yoji Saito, Takaaki Yokota, Masatsugu Arai, Yukio Tada, Masahiko Sumitani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Potential drug-induced constipation: A retrospective study using a Japanese claims database.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in the management of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Naldemedine: A New Option for OIBD.Journal of pain research · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoji SaitoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan.
Takaaki YokotaProject Management Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan, takaaki.yokota@shionogi.co.jp.
Masatsugu AraiBusiness Development Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Yukio TadaBiostatistics Center, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiko SumitaniDepartment of Pain and Palliative Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shionogi (Japan) · JPShimane University Hospital · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNaldemedine is a peripherally-acting µ-opioid-receptor antagonist, approved in Japan for opioid-induced constipation (OIC). In two open-label, single-arm, Phase III studies, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of naldemedine in Japanese patients with OIC receiving regular-use opioids (COMPOSE-6) or prolonged-release oxycodone (COMPOSE-7) for chronic noncancer pain.

methodsEligible Japanese adults with OIC and chronic noncancer pain received once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg for 48 weeks, irrespective of food intake. Primary end points included measures of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pain intensity, and opioid withdrawal. Secondary efficacy end points were evaluated at treatment week 2. Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) scores were evaluated in both 48-week studies.

resultsOf patients enrolled in COMPOSE-6 (N = 43) and COMPOSE-7 (N = 10), TEAEs were reported in 88% (95% CI 74.9-96.1) and 90% (95% CI 55.5-99.7), respectively. The most frequently reported TEAEs, nasopharyngitis and diarrhea, were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Assessments of pain intensity and opioid withdrawal remained stable over the 48-week treatment periods of both studies. The proportion of spontaneous bowel-movement responders at week 2 in COMPOSE-6 was 81.0% (95% CI 65.9-91.4) and 90.0% (95% CI 55.5-99.7) in COMPOSE-7. Significant and sustained improvements in PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL scores were also observed in both studies (all

conclusionSide effects that occurred with naldemedine were mostly mild or moderate in severity, and the data suggested that naldemedine can improve bowel function and QOL in Japanese patients with OIC receiving regular-use opioids or prolonged-release oxycodone for chronic noncancer pain.

Indexed as

bowel functionclinical studiesopioidsPAC-QOLPAC-SYMpatient assessment of constipation QOLpatient assessment of constipation symptomsperipherally-acting µ-opioid-receptor antagonists

Identifiers

PMID30613161
PMCPMC6307491
OpenAlexW2906415573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.