Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30612809›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2019

Do Adolescent Women's Contraceptive Preferences Predict Method Use and Satisfaction? A Survey of Northern California Family Planning Clients.

Amelia W Walker, Lisa Stern, Danielle Cipres, Amanda Rodriguez, Janette Alvarez, Dominika Seidman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Expanding Contraceptive Access for Teens-Leveraging the Pediatric Emergency Department.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amelia W WalkerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Lisa SternPlanned Parenthood Northern California, San Francisco, California.
Danielle CipresDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Amanda RodriguezDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Janette AlvarezDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Dominika SeidmanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California; Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: nika.seidman@post.harvard.edu.

Funding

WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTERK12HD001262 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Andrea Vashti Jackson · 1998 to 2026
$9.3M
Promoting Research Opportunities Fully--Prospective Academics Transforming HealthR25MD006832 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ARONSON, LOUISE, FERNANDEZ, ALICIA · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Clinical and Transtional Science InstituteTL1TR000144 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$643k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000144NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001262NIMHD NIH HHS R25 MD006832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContraceptive satisfaction may influence not only contraceptive use but also long-term engagement in care. We investigated the extent to which adolescent and young women's desired contraceptive features are associated with their current contraceptive method and if the presence of preferred features in their current method is associated with satisfaction.

methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey at five Northern California family planning clinics, including women aged 13-24 years. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression identified associations between desired features and sociodemographic characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine associations between desired features and current contraceptive method, as well as the presence of desired features and satisfaction with current method.

resultsAmong 814 participants, the features most frequently rated "very important" included effectiveness (87%, n = 685), safety (85%, n = 664), and side effects (72%, n = 562). Contraceptive feature preferences varied by age, race/ethnicity, intimate partner violence history, and sexually transmitted infection history. Having a preference for a specific contraceptive feature was not associated with using a method with that feature, except for sexually transmitted infection prevention (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.59, confidence interval [CI; 1.18-2.16]). However, respondents with preferences for effectiveness, partner independence, or privacy who used methods that were congruent with their preferences were more likely to express satisfaction (aOR

conclusionAdolescent and young women have varied contraceptive preferences that are associated with demographics and reproductive health experiences. Adolescent and young women's use of contraceptive methods that matched their preferences may improve satisfaction and engagement in care.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesPatient PreferencePersonal SatisfactionAdolescentAdultCaliforniaContraceptionContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPatient SafetySexually Transmitted DiseasesSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAdolescentsContraceptionHealth disparitiesPatient centeredPatient preferenceReproductive health

Identifiers

PMID30612809
PMCPMC6538030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.