Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30612635›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2019

Cancer susceptibility gene mutations in type I and II endometrial cancer.

Beverly Long, Jenna Lilyquist, Amy Weaver, Chunling Hu, Rohan Gnanaolivu, Kun Y Lee, Steven N Hart, Eric C Polley, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Fergus J Couch and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. AtypicalFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Endometrial cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beverly LongMayo Clinic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America. Electronic address: beverly.long.11@gmail.com.
Jenna LilyquistMayo Clinic, Department of Epidemiology, United States of America.
Amy WeaverMayo Clinic, Department of Biostatistics, United States of America.
Chunling HuMayo Clinic, Department of Pathology, United States of America.
Rohan GnanaolivuMayo Clinic, Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, United States of America.
Kun Y LeeMayo Clinic, Department of Pathology, United States of America.
Steven N HartMayo Clinic, Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, United States of America.
Eric C PolleyMayo Clinic, Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, United States of America.
Jamie N Bakkum-GamezMayo Clinic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America.
Fergus J CouchMayo Clinic, Department of Epidemiology, United States of America.
Sean C DowdyMayo Clinic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · USGynecologic Oncology Group · US

Funding

Risk and penetrance of mutations from breast cancer testing panels.R01CA192393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH, NATHANSON, KATHERINE L. · 2014 to 2018
$6.3M
Mayo Cancer Genetic Epidemiology Training ProgramR25CA092049 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, GLORIA M., VACHON, CELINE M · 2001 to 2018
$5.3M
Identifying and validating novel susceptibility genes for breast cancerR01CA176785 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH, NATHANSON, KATHERINE L. · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176785NCI NIH HHS R01 CA192393NCI NIH HHS R25 CA092049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the incidence of germline cancer predisposition gene mutations in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) subtypes.

methodsGermline DNA was extracted from whole blood collected from consenting patients undergoing primary surgery for EC between 5/2005 and 11/2016. DNA samples were evaluated by product sequencing from a targeted multiplex PCR panel including 21 known/suspected cancer predisposition genes. Variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic based on allele frequency (<0.003), effects on protein function, and ClinVar assertions.

resultsGermline panel testing was performed on 1170 cases of EC; 849 (72.6%) were type I, and 321 (27.4%) were type II EC, including 135 (11.5%) uterine serous cancers (USC). BRCA1 mutations were enriched in Type II EC compared to Type I EC (0.93% vs. 0.12%, p = 0.07). Lynch Syndrome (LS) mutations were identified in 1.4% of type I and 1.6% of type II EC (p = 0.79), including 1.5% for USC. In total, predisposition gene mutations were present in 4.2% of type I and 5.3% of type II EC, as well as 6.7% of patients with USC).

conclusionsBRCA1/2 and Lynch mutations were rare in this cohort of unselected patients with type I and II EC, including USC. However, the presence of predisposition gene mutations in 4.2% of EC type I, 5.3% of EC type II, and 6.7% of USC suggests that somatic mutation testing should be considered for all EC patients.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationAgedEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30612635
PMCPMC6326093
OpenAlexW2898540681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.