Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30612585›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing as an analgesic adjunct to first aid for the treatment of acute paediatric thermal burn injuries: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Maleea D Holbert, Bronwyn R Griffin, Steven M McPhail, Robert S Ware, Kelly Foster, Demi C Bertoni, Roy M Kimble

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Burn first aid issues again-"Not seeing the forest for the trees".Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maleea D HolbertCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. m.holbert@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9902-5122
Bronwyn R GriffinCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Steven M McPhailCentre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Health, Buranda, Australia.
Robert S WareMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Kelly FosterPaediatric Emergency Research Unit, Children's Health Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia.
Demi C BertoniPegg Leditschke Paediatric Burns Centre, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia.
Roy M KimbleCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Children's Medical Research Institute · AUChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUChildren’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUGriffith University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Mundipharma 2014001961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurns are a painful and traumatic experience, particularly in children. Reduced pain and anxiety positively influences re-epithelialisation rates in paediatric burn patients, however current literature fails to fully explain the effects of pain and anxiety and their links with wound healing. This study will determine if Burnaid® hydrogel dressing is an effective treatment for reducing pain in the acute period of a burn injury. It is hypothesised that a reduction in pain will then improve re-epithelialisation time in comparison to plastic wrap, which is standard practice at our institution - a metropolitan tertiary paediatric hospital located in Brisbane, Australia. METHODS/

designA randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of Burnaid® as an analgesic adjunct to cold running water first aid for the treatment of paediatric burns. Participants will include children aged between 0 and 16 years with an acute thermal burn injury (total burn surface area < 20%) presenting to the Department of Emergency within 24 h of the burn occurring. Participants will be randomised into one of two groups: (1) Burnaid® hydrogel (intervention arm) or (2) plastic wrap (control arm). Participants will also be stratified into one of two groups based on factors that influence pain intensity: (1) high pain risk or (2) low pain risk. High pain risk factors include foot burns, hot coal/ash/fire pit burns, burn area greater than 5%, and circumferential burns. The primary outcome is the intervention's effect on reducing acute pain. Secondary outcomes include days to re-epithelialisation, pulse rate, temperature, salivary cortisol and α-amylase, anxiety, and cost-effectiveness. Sample size calculations have shown that 36 participants will be recruited into each group. DISCUSSION: This study will provide comprehensive data on the analgesic properties of Burnaid® as an adjunct to first aid for the treatment of acute paediatric thermal burns. If the intervention is effective in reducing pain, Burnaid® will be integrated as standard practice within the hospital's Department of Emergency. This study replicates a real-world scenario in order to identify clinically significant analgesic and wound-healing effects.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617001274369 . Prospectively registered on 5 Sept 2017.

Indexed as

BandagesFirst AidHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAcute DiseaseAdolescentAnalgesicsBurnsChildChild, PreschoolData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementAnalgesicsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateAnalgesiaBurnaid®BurnsDressingFirst aidHydrogelPaediatricPainRandomised controlled trialRe-epithelialisation

Identifiers

PMID30612585
PMCPMC6322255
OpenAlexW2908346980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.