ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019
Young patient with hantavirus-induced myocarditis detected by comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance assessment.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of ultrasound to predict severe disease in patients with dengue and other viral infections associated with hemorrhagic fevers.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe report a case of hantavirus-induced myocarditis in a young adult. Hantavirus showed a rapid increase of infections in the year 2017. Only scarce data is available about potential myocardial involvement in hantavirus infections. With ECG and echocardiography providing often inconclusive results, a multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance protocol with distinct myocardial tissue characterization seems to be the adequate tool for detecting even slight myocardial alterations. CASE PRESENTATION: This case started with the presentation of young adult suffering from headache and abdominal pain. Thrombocytes were decreased, creatinine was elevated, and there was massive proteinuria. Puumala virus IgG ELISA turned out to be positive, and specific antibodies (IgG and IgM) could be detected in the serum, and confirmed by immunoassay. The patient was admitted to the nephrology department for supportive therapy. Few days later, the patient reported chest pain and dyspnea. High sensitivity troponin I rose up to 0.32 μg/l (normal range below 0.04 μg/l) with an increase of the creatinkinase to 319 U/l (normal max. 190 U/l), no dynamic ECG changes could be observed. Echocardiography revealed a normal left ventricular function without regional wall motion abnormalities, no pericardial effusion or valve abnormalities, coronary artery disease could be excluded by computed tomography. A multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance protocol including recent mapping techniques confirmed myocardial involvement induced by acute hantavirus infection. In the next few weeks, the patient's state of health rapidly improved and symptoms of chest pain and dyspnea disappeared. Follow up multiparametric CMR exam showed substantial decrease of the previously observed myocardial alterations during acute hantavirus infection suggesting myocardial healing.
conclusionsThis case demonstrates that a CMR protocol including recent mapping techniques and established late gadolinium enhancement technique is an adequate non-invasive tool for both 1) initial detection, and 2) follow up of patients with hantavirus-induced myocarditis, which might be more common than previously known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.