Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30612506›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Association Between Wait Time for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Early Postprocedural Outcomes.

Gabby Elbaz-Greener, Brianne Yarranton, Feng Qiu, David A Wood, John G Webb, Stephen E Fremes, Sam Radhakrishnan, Harindra C Wijeysundera

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acute Valve Syndrome in Aortic Stenosis.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sarcopenia and aortic valve disease.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabby Elbaz-Greener1 Division of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Schulich Heart Centre Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Ontario Canada.
Brianne Yarranton1 Division of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Schulich Heart Centre Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Ontario Canada.
Feng Qiu2 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
David A Wood3 Center for Heart Valve Innovation St Paul's Hospital University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
John G Webb3 Center for Heart Valve Innovation St Paul's Hospital University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Stephen E Fremes1 Division of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Schulich Heart Centre Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Ontario Canada.
Sam Radhakrishnan1 Division of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Schulich Heart Centre Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Ontario Canada.
Harindra C Wijeysundera1 Division of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Schulich Heart Centre Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Ontario Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Rapid growth in transcatheter aortic valve replacement ( TAVR ) demand has translated to inadequate access, reflected by prolonged wait times. Increasing wait times are associated with important adverse outcomes while on the wait-list; however, it is unknown if prolonged wait times influence postprocedural outcomes. Our objective was to determine the association between TAVR wait times and postprocedural outcomes. Methods and Results In this population-based study in Ontario, Canada, we identified all TAVR procedures between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2016. Wait time was defined as the number of days between initial referral and the procedure. Primary outcomes of interest were 30-day all-cause mortality and all-cause readmission. Multivariable regression models incorporated wait time as a nonlinear variable, using cubic splines. The study cohort included 2170 TAVR procedures, of which 1741 cases were elective and 429 were urgent. There was a significant, nonlinear relationship between TAVR wait time and post- TAVR 30-day mortality, as well as 30-day readmission. We observed an increased hazard associated with shorter wait times that diminished as wait times increased. This statistically significant nonlinear relationship was seen in the unadjusted model as well as after adjusting for clinical variables. However, after adjusting for case urgency status, there was no relationship between wait times and postprocedural outcomes. In sensitivity analyses restricted to either only elective or only urgent cases, there was no relationship between wait times and postprocedural outcomes. Conclusions Wait time has a complex relationship with postprocedural outcomes that is mediated entirely by urgency status. This suggests that further research should elucidate factors that predict hospitalization requiring urgent TAVR while on the wait list.

Indexed as

RegistriesWaiting ListsAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCause of DeathFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOntarioPatient ReadmissionPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factorsoutcometranscatheter aortic valve implantationtranscatheter aortic valve replacementwait time

Identifiers

PMID30612506
PMCPMC6405724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.