Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30612489›Full record

ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2019

Hypertension Treatment Rates and Health Care Worker Density.

Rajesh Vedanthan, Mondira Ray, Valentin Fuster, Ellen Magenheim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rajesh VedanthanFrom the Section for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, NY (R.V.).
Mondira RayUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA (M.R.).
Valentin FusterMount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY (V.F.).
Ellen MagenheimDepartment of Economics, Swarthmore College, PA (E.M.).

Funding

Bridging Income Generation with Group Integrated Care (BIGPIC)R01HL125487 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI VEDANTHAN, RAJESH · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated blood pressure is the leading cause of death worldwide; however, treatment and control rates for hypertension are low. Here, we analyze the relationship between physician and nurse density and hypertension treatment rates worldwide. Data on hypertension treatment rates were collected from the STEPwise approach to Surveillance country reports, individual studies resulting from a PubMed search for articles published between 1990 and 2010, and manual search of the reference lists of extracted studies. Data on health care worker density were obtained from the Global Atlas of the Health Workforce. We controlled for a variety of variables related to population characteristics and access to health care, data obtained from the World Bank, World Development Indicators, United Nations, and World Health Organization. We used clustering of SEs at the country level. Full data were available for 154 hypertension treatment rate values representing 68 countries between 1990 and 2010. Hypertension treatment rate ranged from 3.4% to 82.5%, with higher treatment rates associated with higher income classification. Physician and nurse/midwife generally increased with income classification. Total healthcare worker density was significantly associated with hypertension treatment rate in the unadjusted model ( P<0.001); however, only nurse density remained significant in the fully adjusted model ( P=0.050). These analyses suggest that nurse density, not physician density, explains most of the relationship with hypertension treatment rate and remains significant even after adjusting for other independent variables. These results have important implications for health policy, health system design, and program implementation.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHealth PersonnelHumansHypertensionRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurecardiovascular diseasehealth workforcehypertensionnurses

Identifiers

PMID30612489
PMCPMC6374168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.