ArticleEvaluation & the health professions2020
Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative.
Article in Evaluation & the health professions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parent Perspectives on Optimal Communication About a New Prenatal Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Concept Mapping Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Community-Led Transformation in Practice: A Framework for Trust-Driven Community-Academic Partnerships to Advance Public Health.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Review
- Who is the emergency care community? A qualitative exploration of stakeholder roles and relationships in engaged research within a South African provincial emergency care system.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- Engaging Underserved Populations in Health Preference Research: Challenges and Strategies.The patient · 2025Article
- Improving Community-Engaged Implementation Science: Perspectives From "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Award Cases in the United States.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
- Clinical and translational science award hub portfolio analysis and interorganizational collaborations with Los Angeles County to improve population health and health care delivery (ID 1565096).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Identifying and addressing institutional barriers to community partner compensation for engaged research: A Clinical and Translational Science Award case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Embedding a commitment to equitable global access into basic and early-phase translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Make me a match: Creating research partnerships to build capacity for the evaluation of community initiatives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community-engaged research: Bringing the science of developmental psychopathology into the real world.Development and psychopathology · 2024Article
- Walk With Me: reducing harm and confronting the toxic drug poisoning crisis in small British Columbia cities through community engaged research.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- Building Community Engagement Capacity in a Transdisciplinary Population Health Research Consortium.Journal of community engagement and scholarship · 2024Article
- Changes in Electroencephalography Alpha Associated With Childhood Neglect and Adolescent Alcohol Use.Child maltreatment · 2023Article
- Community-Based Public Health Vaccination Campaign (VaccinateLA) in Los Angeles' Black and Latino Communities: Protocol for a Participatory Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Developing relevant assessments of community-engaged research partnerships: A community-based participatory approach to evaluating clinical and health research study teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Social determinants of health among noncitizen deported US veterans: A participatory action study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Action learning and public health pedagogy: Student reflections from an experiential public health course.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Aligning healthcare, public health and social services: A scoping review of the role of purpose, governance, finance and data.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- "There's not much we can do…" researcher-level barriers to the inclusion of underrepresented participants in translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Retaining Adolescent and Young Adult Participants in Research During a Pandemic: Best Practices From Two Large-Scale Developmental Neuroimaging Studies (NCANDA and ABCD).Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-engaged research (CEnR) builds on the strengths of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) framework to address health in underserved and minority communities. There is a paucity of studies that identify the process from which trust develops in CEnR partnerships. This study responds to the need for empirical investigation of building and maintaining trust from a multistakeholder perspective. We conducted a multi-institutional pilot study using concept mapping with to better understand how trust, a critical outcome of CEnR partnerships, can act as "social capital." Concept mapping was used to collect data from the three stakeholder groups: community, health-care, and academic research partners across three CTSAs. Concept mapping is a mixed-methods approach that allows participants to brainstorm and identify factors that contribute to a concept and describe ways in which those factors relate to each other. This study offers important insights on developing an initial set of trust measures that can be used across CTSAs to understand differences and similarities in conceptualization of trust among key stakeholder groups, track changes in public trust in research, identify both positive and negative aspects of trust, identify characteristics that maintain trust, and inform the direction for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.