ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2019
Awareness and management of pulmonary embolism among physicians in China: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awareness and Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with COVID-19: A National Cross-Sectional Survey in Epidemic Era.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. We intended to evaluate the awareness and management status of PE among Chinese physicians and provide the basis for establishing Chinese clinical guidelines on PE. We designed a nationwide survey to collect data on physicians' awareness of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up on PE. The questionnaires were distributed to physicians during offline academic meetings and by the online platforms from August 2016 to October 2016. Also, results were sub-grouped by age, hospital grades, departments and trained or not. A total of 2954 valid questionnaires were collected. We observed that there were several defects in the management of PE among Chinese physicians. First, a considerable proportion of physicians chose the incorrect clinical prediction rules for acute PE. Second, a considerable percentage of hospitals could not carry out computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (22.4%) or ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (65.2%). Third, only a few physicians knew the use of new oral anticoagulants clearly (33.4%). Fourth, only 49% of physicians achieved follow-up management in over half of their patients. Additionally, physicians in the tertiary hospitals, aged > 35 years, trained and from respiratory department have a better knowledge of the management of PE. In conclusion, our survey demonstrates the enhancement of PE-related trainings, especially for physicians in lower-level hospitals, aged ≤ 35 years and from non-respiratory department, can help to improve the management of PE in Chinese physicians. And our study also highlights the need for the establishment of national guidelines for the management of PE in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.