Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30612185›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2019

Bioreactivity and Microbiome of Biodeposits from Filter-Feeding Bivalves.

Anna E Murphy, Rebecca Kolkmeyer, Bongkuen Song, Iris C Anderson, Jennifer Bowen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intrahabitat Differences in Bacterial Communities Associated withApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna E MurphyMarine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA, 01908, USA. an.murphy@northeastern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4904-769X
Rebecca KolkmeyerUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Bongkuen SongCollege of William & Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA.
Iris C AndersonCollege of William & Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA.
Jennifer BowenMarine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA, 01908, USA.
Northeastern University · USWilliam & Mary · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

National Science Foundation LTER 0080381National Science Foundation OCE 1062882National Science Foundation OCE 1233801Virginia Sea Grant, Virginia Institute of Marine Science NA10OAR4170085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bivalves serve an important ecosystem function in delivering organic matter from pelagic to benthic zones and are important in mediating eutrophication. However, the fate of this organic matter (i.e., biodeposits) is an important consideration when assessing the ecological roles of these organisms in coastal ecosystems. In addition to environmental conditions, the processing of biodeposits is dependent on its composition and the metabolic capacity of the associated microbial community. The objectives of this study were to compare the biological reactivity, potential denitrification rates, and microbial communities of biodeposits sourced from different bivalve species: hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria), eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), and ribbed mussel (Geukensia demissa). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate and compare the microbiome of bivalve biodeposits using high-throughput sequencing and provide important insight into the mechanisms by which bivalves may alter sediment microbial communities and benthic biogeochemical cycles. We show that clam biodeposits had significantly higher bioreactivity compared to mussel and oyster biodeposits, as reflected in higher dissolved inorganic carbon and ammonium production rates in controlled incubations. Potential denitrification rates were also significantly higher for clam biodeposits compared to oyster and mussel biodeposits. The microbial communities associated with the biodeposits were significantly different across bivalve species, with significantly greater abundances of Alteromonadales, Chitinophagales, Rhodobacterales, and Thiotrichales associated with the clam biodeposits. These bioreactivity and microbial differences across bivalve species are likely due to differences in bivalve physiology and feeding behavior and should be considered when evaluating the effects of bivalves on water quality and ecosystem function.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAmmonium CompoundsAnimalsBacteriaBivalviaCarbonCrassostreaEutrophicationGeologic SedimentsMercenariaPhylogenySeawaterAmmonium CompoundsCarbonBiodepositsBioreactivityBivalvesDenitrificationLabilityMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID30612185
OpenAlexW2908402908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.