ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2019
Alarin in different human intestinal epithelial cell types.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolving roles of alarin in physiological and disease conditions, and its future potential clinical implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Neuropeptidergic Control of Feeding: Focus on the Galanin Family of Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- In Focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alarin (AL), a new member of the galanin family, has been localized in various CNS regions, mainly in rodents. Among other effects, it modulates food intake. Therefore, we analyzed the immunohistochemical distribution pattern of AL in human intestinal epithelia. Cryosections of 12 human bowel samples were immunohistochemically double-stained for AL and α-defensin 5 (αD; first set). Two further sets of sections were quadruple-stained either (second set) for AL, chromogranin (CG), synaptophysin (SY), and somatostatin (SO) or (third set) for AL, CG, Peptide Y (PY), and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). Slides were digitized and quantitative analysis of co-localization rates was undertaken. Small bowel: most of AL-positive cells (56%) were αD-positive Paneth cells located within the base of the crypts (first set). In the second set, about 27% of AL-labeled cells were co-reactive for SY and CG, likely representing entero-endocrine cells. In the third set, the largest subpopulation of AL-positive cells was not co-reactive for other markers applied (89%); most of them were likely Paneth cells. Large bowel: co-localization of AL with αD was not detected (first set). In the second set, AL was frequently co-localized with the other three markers applied (68%). In the third set, AL was frequently co-localized with 5-HT and CG (31%) as well as with PY and 5-HT (22%). Due to its presence in various enteroendocrine as well as Paneth cells, AL may be involved in different physiological and pathological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.