ArticleTranslational oncology2019
Urinary Cysteine-Rich Protein 61 and Trefoil Factor 3 as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary dipeptidase 1 and trefoil factor 1 are promising biomarkers for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.Journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Immunoassays: Analytical and Clinical Performance, Challenges, and Perspectives of SERS Detection in Comparison with Fluorescent Spectroscopic Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cyr61 Mediates Angiotensin II-Induced Podocyte Apoptosis via the Upregulation of TXNIP.Journal of immunology research · 2023Article
- Noninvasive urinary protein signatures associated with colorectal cancer diagnosis and metastasis.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Article
- Urinary microRNA biomarkers for detecting the presence of esophageal cancer.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Novel Biomarkers of Gastrointestinal Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Review
- Updates on Clinical Use of Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Follow-Up, and Treatment Guidance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Evaluation of kininogen 1, osteopontin and α-1-antitrypsin in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and urine for lung squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- A novel urinary microRNA biomarker panel for detecting gastric cancer.Journal of gastroenterology · 2019Article
- [Angiotensin Ⅱ induces apoptosis of HEK293T cells by up-regulating Cyr61 expression].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since a fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer (CRC) does not offer sufficient diagnostic power for CRC, novel non-invasive biomarkers are hopeful for CRC screening. We conducted the current study to discover non-invasive urinary biomarkers for diagnosing CRC. Among urine samples from 258 patients (CRC, n = 148; healthy controls, n = 110), a cohort of 176 patients composed of 88 patients with GC and 88 healthy controls was selected after age- and sex-matching using propensity score. This cohort was then randomly divided into 2 groups: 53 pairs (106 patients) in the training cohort, and 35 pairs (70 patients) in the validation cohort. No significant differences were found for baseline characteristics between the CRC and healthy control groups in both training and validation cohorts. On multivariate analysis in the training cohort, urinary levels of cysteine-rich protein 61 (uCyr61) and trefoil factor 3 (uTFF3) were identified as independent significant diagnostic markers for CRC. Moreover, uCyr61 alone and the combination of uCyr61 and uTFF3 allowed significant differentiation between healthy controls and CRC groups in the training set (uCyr61: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.745 [95% CI, 0.653-0.838]; uCyr61 + uTFF3: AUC = 0.753 [95% CI, 0.659-0.847]). In the validation cohort, uCyr61 and uTFF3 were significantly higher in the CRC group than in the healthy control group, and they also allowed significant differentiation between healthy control and CRC groups (uCyr61: AUC = 0.696 [95% CI, 0.571-0.822]; uTFF3: AUC = 0.639 [95% CI, 0.508-0.770]; uCyr61 + uTFF3: AUC = 0.720 [95% CI, 0.599-0.841]), as in the training cohort. A panel combining uCyr61 and uTFF3 offers a promising non-invasive biomarker for diagnosing CRC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.