ArticleVision research2019
Image segmentation driven by elements of form.
Article in Vision research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low sensitivity for orientation in texture similarity ratings.Journal of vision · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While luminance, contrast, orientation, and terminators are well-established features that are extracted in early visual processing and support the parsing of an image into its component regions, the role of more complex features, such as closure and convexity, is less clear. A main barrier in understanding the roles of such features is that manipulating their occurrence typically entails changes in the occurrence of more elementary features as well. To address this problem, we developed a set of synthetic visual textures, constructed by replacing the binary coloring of standard maximum-entropy textures with tokens (tiles) containing curved or angled elements. The tokens were designed so that there were no discontinuities at their edges, and so that changing the correlation structure of the underlying binary texture changed the shapes that were produced. The resulting textures were then used in psychophysical studies, demonstrating that the resulting feature differences sufficed to drive segmentation. However, in contrast to previous findings for lower-level features, sensitivities to increases and decreases of feature occurrence were unequal. Moreover, the texture-segregation response depended on the kind of token (curved vs. angular, filled-in vs. outlined), and not just on the correlation structure. Analysis of this dependence indicated that simple closed contours and convex elements suffice to drive image segmentation, in the absence of changes in lower-level cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.