Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30611265›Full record

ArticleLipids in health and disease2019

The effects of hindlimb unloading versus dietary cholesterol and resistance training on rat skeletal muscle responses.

Teak V Lee, Chang Woock Lee, Vincent C W Chen, Steve Bui, James D Fluckey, Steven E Riechman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Teak V LeeLife Sciences Department, Pierce College, 6201 Winnetka Avenue, Woodland Hills, CA, 91371, USA. leetv@piercecollege.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2639-5824
Chang Woock LeeSchool of Education, Health Professions, and Human Development, University of Houston-Victoria, Victoria, TX, USA.
Vincent C W ChenExercise Science, Wellness and Sports Department, Georgian Court University, Lakewood, NJ, USA.
Steve BuiDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Dixie State University, St. George, UT, USA.
James D FluckeyDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Steven E RiechmanDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe loss of muscle mass and concomitantly strength, poses a serious risk to the elderly and to astronauts. Dietary cholesterol (CL), in conjunction with resistance training (RT), has been strongly associated with improvements in lean mass. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two opposing environments on rat skeletal muscle: (1) hindlimb unloading and (2) CL and RT.

methodsIn protocol 1, 13 male Sprague-Dawley rats were unloaded for 28 days (HU; n = 6) or served as cage controls (CC; n = 7). In protocol 2, 42 rats were assigned to 1 of 6 groups: CC (n = 7), CC + CL (n = 4), RT controls (RTC; n = 7), RTC + CL (n = 8), RT (n = 8) and RT + CL (n = 8). RT/RTC consisted of squat-like exercise. RT had weights added progressively from 80 to 410 g over 5 weeks. CL was supplemented in the chow with either 180 ppm (controls) or 1800 ppm (CL). Lower limb muscles were harvested at the end of both protocols and analyzed by Western Blotting for sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 (SREBP-2) and low-density lipoprotein-receptor (LDL-R) and protein synthesis.

resultsGastrocnemius and plantaris masses and their body mass ratios were significantly lower in the HU rats than control rats. The RT rats gained significantly less body and lean mass than the RTC groups, but the plantar flexor muscles did not show any significant differences among groups. Moreover, RT groups had significantly higher plantaris mixed muscle fractional synthesis rate (FSR) than the RTC and CC animals, with the CL groups showing greater FSR than control rats. No significant differences among groups in SREBP-2 or LDL-R were observed in either protocol.

conclusionsThese studies provide evidence for a relationship between skeletal muscle and cholesterol metabolism, but the exact nature of that association remains unclear.

Indexed as

Hindlimb SuspensionAnimalsCholesterol, DietaryGene ExpressionMaleMuscle, SkeletalOrgan SizePhysical Conditioning, AnimalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, LDLResistance TrainingSterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2Cholesterol, DietaryReceptors, LDLSterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2And proteins essential to cholesterol metabolismDietary cholesterolHindlimb unloadingResistance training

Identifiers

PMID30611265
PMCPMC6320614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.