Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30611200›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

DEBrowser: interactive differential expression analysis and visualization tool for count data.

Alper Kucukural, Onur Yukselen, Deniz M Ozata, Melissa J Moore, Manuel Garber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Probing RNA-protein interactions in the early mouse embryo.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Zinc-limitedInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  20. Genomic analyses reveal high diversity and rapid evolution ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alper KucukuralBioinformatics Core, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA. alper.kucukural@umassmed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9983-394X
Onur YukselenBioinformatics Core, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Deniz M OzataRNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Melissa J MooreRNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Manuel GarberBioinformatics Core, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA. manuel.garber@umassmed.edu.

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical Science and Translational SupplementUL1TR001453 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2015 to 2024
$39.0M
Rules of gene expression modeled on human dendritic cell response to pathogensU01HG007910 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GARBER, MANUEL, LUBAN, JEREMY · 2015 to 2017
$6.1M
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US) UL1 TR001453-01National Human Genome Research Institute #U01 HG007910-01NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001453NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequencing data has become a standard measure of diverse cellular activities. For example, gene expression is accurately measured by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) libraries, protein-DNA interactions are captured by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq), protein-RNA interactions by crosslinking immunoprecipitation sequencing (CLIP-Seq) or RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP-Seq) sequencing, DNA accessibility by assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (ATAC-Seq), DNase or MNase sequencing libraries. The processing of these sequencing techniques involves library-specific approaches. However, in all cases, once the sequencing libraries are processed, the result is a count table specifying the estimated number of reads originating from each genomic locus. Differential analysis to determine which loci have different cellular activity under different conditions starts with the count table and iterates through a cycle of data assessment, preparation and analysis. Such complex analysis often relies on multiple programs and is therefore a challenge for those without programming skills.

resultsWe developed DEBrowser as an R bioconductor project to interactively visualize every step of the differential analysis, without programming. The application provides a rich and interactive web based graphical user interface built on R's shiny infrastructure. DEBrowser allows users to visualize data with various types of graphs that can be explored further by selecting and re-plotting any desired subset of data. Using the visualization approaches provided, users can determine and correct technical variations such as batch effects and sequencing depth that affect differential analysis. We show DEBrowser's ease of use by reproducing the analysis of two previously published data sets.

conclusionsDEBrowser is a flexible, intuitive, web-based analysis platform that enables an iterative and interactive analysis of count data without any requirement of programming knowledge.

Indexed as

SoftwareChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationData Interpretation, StatisticalDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNAChromatinDNADNA-Binding ProteinsData visualizationDifferential expressionInteractive data analysis

Identifiers

PMID30611200
PMCPMC6321710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.