Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30610472›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2019

Efficacy Comparison of Preprandial and Postprandial Prandilin 25 Administration in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Yong Luo, Wen-Ji Ni, B O Ding, Xiang-Hong Xu, Lei Ye, Jian-Hua Ma, Jian Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yong LuoDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Wen-Ji NiDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
B O DingDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiang-Hong XuDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lei YeNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Jian-Hua MaDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. majianhua@china.com.
Jian ZhuDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. drzhujian@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-9883
Nanjing Medical University · CNNational Heart Centre Singapore · SG

Funding

Scientific and Technological Development Program of Jiangsu Province BL2014010The Nanjing Medical Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars JQX12006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of preprandial and postprandial Prandilin 25 (premixed insulin lispro 25) administration in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system.

methodsThis was a single-center, self-controlled comparative clinical trial. Newly diagnosed T2DM patients with hemoglobin A1c > 8.0% were hospitalized and received Prandilin 25 plus metformin treatment. Glycemic control was reached after a 7-to-8-day run-in period. Patients underwent 2 days of treatment consisting of preprandial Prandilin 25 on day 1 and postprandial Prandilin 25 on day 2 at the same dosage. The primary outcome was the 24-h mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (24 hMAGE); secondary outcomes were other daily glycemic variability parameters, including 24-h mean blood glucose (24hMBG), 24-h standard deviation of blood glucose (24hSDBG), large amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE), incremental area under the curve (AUC) values for different glucose levels, postprandial glucose excursion, and incidence of hypoglycemia, which were assessed using a CGM system.

resultsEighty-five patients completed this study. There was no statistically significant difference in 24hMAGE, 24hMBG, 24hSDBG, or LAGE between the preprandial injection group and the postprandial injection group. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in the AUC for a blood glucose level below 3.9 mmol/L, in the AUC for a blood glucose level above 10.0 mmol/L, or in the percentages of time that the blood glucose level was below 3.9 mmol/L or above 10.0 mmol/L. Further analysis showed that the pre-meal glucose, peak height, and time to peak after each meal, the relative areas under the CGM curve at 1-4 h after each meal, as well as the incidence of hypoglycemia, were similar for the preprandial and postprandial Prandilin 25 groups.

conclusionIn patients with T2DM managed with premixed insulin lispro 25, postprandial injection (within 30 min of meal onset) may be an acceptable alternative to preprandial injection when the regular preprandial insulin dose is omitted.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Register identifier: ChiCTR1800015828.

Indexed as

Continuous glucose monitoringPostprandial administrationPrandilin 25T2DM

Identifiers

PMID30610472
PMCPMC6349270
OpenAlexW2907433785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.