Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30610419›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2019

Respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis in infants with congenital airway anomalies compared to standard indications and complex medical disorders.

Bosco Paes, Doyoung Kim, Mahwesh Saleem, Sophie Wong, Ian Mitchell, Krista L Lanctot, and the CARESS investigators

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bosco PaesDepartment of Pediatrics - HSC-3A, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. paes@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3308-2706
Doyoung KimMedical Outcomes and Research in Economics (MORE®) Research Group, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mahwesh SaleemMedical Outcomes and Research in Economics (MORE®) Research Group, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sophie WongMedical Outcomes and Research in Economics (MORE®) Research Group, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ian MitchellDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Krista L LanctotMedical Outcomes and Research in Economics (MORE®) Research Group, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
and the CARESS investigators

Funding

AbbVie (Canada) A05-130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An observational study was conducted of children < 2 years who received ≥ 1 dose of palivizumab in 32 Canadian institutions from 2005 to 2017. We compared respiratory illness (RIH) and respiratory syncytial virus-related hospitalization (RSVH) hazards in children with a congenital airway anomaly (CAA) versus those prophylaxed for standard indications (SI) and serious medical disorders (SMD). Data were assembled on neonatal course, demographics, palivizumab utilization and adherence, and respiratory illness events, and analyzed using ANOVA, chi-square tests and Cox proportional hazards. Twenty-five thousand three children (1219 CAA, 3538 SMD, and 20,246 SI) were enrolled. Palivizumab adherence was 74.8% overall and similar across groups. For 2054 respiratory-related events, 1724 children were hospitalized. RIH rates were 13.6% (CAA), 9.6% (SMD), and 6.0% (SI). RSVH rates were 2.4% (CAA), 1.6% (SMD), and 1.5% (SI). After adjustment for demographic and neonatal differences, children with a CAA had a significantly increased RIH and RSVH hazard relative to SI (RIH, HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2, p = 0.002; RSVH, HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-4.4, p = 0.037) but similar to SMD (RIH, HR = 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9, p = 0.190; RSVH, HR = 1.7, 95% CI 0.7-4.1, p = 0.277).Conclusion: Children with a CAA experience higher RIH risk. RSVH hazard was similar between CAA and SMD but higher for CAA compared to SI, implying that this population requires surveillance for RSV prophylaxis. What is Known: • Children with congenital airway anomalies (CAA) are at risk for respiratory tract illness and respiratory syncytial virus-related hospitalization (RSVH) with accompanying morbidity and mortality • RSV prophylaxis may be useful in children with a CAA, but is not routinely recommended What is New: • Children with a CAA had a 1.6-2.3 fold greater risk of respiratory-related hospitalization and RSVH compared to those prophylaxed for standard, approved indications and serious medical disorders. • RSVH risk in children aged < 2 years with either upper or lower airway anomalies is similar. Children with a CAA require careful surveillance during the RSV season and prophylaxis may be appropriate.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePalivizumabProspective StudiesRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory System AbnormalitiesRisk FactorsAntiviral AgentsPalivizumabCongenital airway anomaliesOutcomesPalivizumabRespiratory syncytial virus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.