ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019
Predicting tumor responses and patient survival in chemoradiotherapy-treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced integrated magnetic resonance-positron-emission tomography.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gold-incorporated hyaluronic acid nanoparticles enhance ablative radiotherapy efficacy in lung cancer.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- The prognostic value of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in predicting survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Combination of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibition with ablative radiotherapy remodels the tumor microenvironment and enhances immunotherapy response in lung cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
- Predictive value of metabolic parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient derived from 18F-FDG PET/MR in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Clinical Variables and Radiomics Features for Predicting Pneumothorax in Patients Undergoing CT-guided Transthoracic Core Needle Biopsy.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Preclinical evaluation of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin as an effective radiosensitizer in chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021Article
- Article
- Combing MRI Perfusion andCancers · 2021Article
- Treatment-related changes in neuroendocrine tumors as assessed by textural features derived fromBMC cancer · 2020Article
- Trimodality PET/CT/MRI and Radiotherapy: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe investigated whether radiologic parameters by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) integrated magnetic resonance-positron-emission tomography (MR-PET) predicts tumor response to treatment and survival in non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
methodsPatients underwent DCE integrated MR-PET imaging 1 week before CRT. The following parameters were analyzed: primary tumor size, gross tumor volume, maximal standardized uptake value (SUV
resultsThirty patients were included. Non-responders demonstrated higher baseline TLG (p = 0.012), and lower baseline K
conclusionsThe radiologic parameters derived from DCE integrated MR-PET scans are useful for predicting treatment response in NSCLC patients treated with CRT; furthermore, these parameters are correlated with clinical and survival outcomes including tumor progression and death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30610356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.