ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2019
Mechanical properties of multi-force vs. conventional NiTi archwires.
Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformation Temperatures and Mechanical Properties in Bending of a Multizone Rhodium-Coated NiTi Archwire: A Retrieval Analysis Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- A comparison of the released forces from three different types of nickel-titanium wires at three different deflection positions: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of distal-end heat treatment in the properties of heat-activated NiTi archwires.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2025Article
- Multi-Force Bio-Active™ Archwires and Various Contemporary NiTi Multi-Force Archwires: Properties and Characteristics-A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the efficiency of SmartArch, copper-NiTi, and NiTi archwires in resolving mandibular anterior crowding: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.Journal of orthodontic science · 2024Article
- Thermal Behavior Changes of As-Received and Retrieved Bio-ActiveMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Thermo-mechanical properties in bending of a multizone nickel-titanium archwire: A retrieval analysis.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2023Article
- Effects of Clinical Use on the Mechanical Properties of Bio-ActiveMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional coupling between orthodontic bone remodeling and superelastic behavior of a NiTi wire applied for initial alignment.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsMechanical properties along the length of latest generation "multi-force" archwires were measured and compare with commercially available thermally activated and non-thermally activated nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires. MATERIALS AND
methodsA modified deflection test was used to produce load/deflection curves for different positions along the lengths of a sample of 114 NiTi archwires composed by thermal NiTi, non-thermal NiTi, two types of multi-force NiTi and one type of multi-force copper archwires of various cross-sections (0.016 × 0.016 inch, 0.016 × 0.022 inch, 0.018 × 0.025 inch and 0.019 × 0.025 inch). The length, slope and mean force expressed were calculated from the resulting unloading plateaus, enabling comparison between types of archwire at different points along their lengths.
resultsAmong conventional thermal, conventional nonthermal and multiforce archwires, all parameters investigated were statistically different, whereby the performance of the latter was superior. Multi-force archwires displayed 27% and 31% lighter mean forces in the upper and lower arches, respectively, in addition to 62% and 40% reductions in unloading plateau slope and length, respectively, as compared to conventional CuNiTi wires. Comparison of the different types of multi-force wires tested revealed statistically significant differences in the three parameters, depending on the testing position but irrespective of their cross-section.
conclusionsAlthough conventional archwires display identical behaviour along their lengths, as advertised the multi-force archwires do indeed exert a progressive force which differs between anterior, medial and posterior sections. The multi-force wires provide lighter, more prolonged and constant forces than conventional wires without cross-section-dependent variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30610250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.