ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2019
A critical appraisal of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 425 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
425 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Natural Products in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Critical assessment of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies effects in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting target engagement and clinical meaningfulness.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of anti-amyloid-ß monoclonal antibody therapy in early Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Pooled it
- The FDA-approved anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of medical research · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of anti-Aβ agents for delaying cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Changes in MoCA scores with sequential administration of Trikatu Cūrṇa and Brahmi Ghṛta in mild cognitive impairment: an exploratory single-arm clinical study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single intravenous dose of SHR-1707 in healthy adult subjects: two randomized, double-blind, single-ascending-dose, phase 1 studies.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2024Trial
- Effects of Meditation Training and Non-Native Language Training on Cognition in Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Prospect in Alzheimer's disease integrative therapy targeting both amyloid-beta and tau.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Lysosomal dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Alzheimer's disease burden in China (ABC) study: protocol for a nationwide multicentre cross-sectional and prospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Neuroprotective Effects and Mechanisms of Carvacrol and Thymol in Alzheimer's Disease: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diazonium-Enabled Post-Synthetic Construction of Enantiomeric Single-Atom Nanoagents Used for Alzheimer's Disease Treatment.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Antiamyloid Antibody Effects on Aβ-42 Protein Aggregates Profiled Using Nanospectroscopy.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Spontaneous aging of mature amyloids alters structural stability, cytotoxicity, and susceptibility to biological clearance.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Article
- The Monomeric Conformational Ensembles of Aβ40 and Aβ42 Encode Their Differential Amyloid Aggregation Propensity.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Safety and short-term outcomes of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease in China: a multicentre study.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Article
365 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain accumulation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide is believed to be the initial event in the Alzheimer disease (AD) process. Aβ accumulation begins 15-20 years before clinical symptoms occur, mainly owing to defective brain clearance of the peptide. Over the past 20 years, we have seen intensive efforts to decrease the levels of Aβ monomers, oligomers, aggregates and plaques using compounds that decrease production, antagonize aggregation or increase brain clearance of Aβ. Unfortunately, these approaches have failed to show clinical benefit in large clinical trials involving patients with mild to moderate AD. Clinical trials in patients at earlier stages of the disease are ongoing, but the initial results have not been clinically impressive. Efforts are now being directed against Aβ oligomers, the most neurotoxic molecular species, and monoclonal antibodies directed against these oligomers are producing encouraging results. However, Aβ oligomers are in equilibrium with both monomeric and aggregated species; thus, previous drugs that efficiently removed monomeric Aβ or Aβ plaques should have produced clinical benefits. In patients with sporadic AD, Aβ accumulation could be a reactive compensatory response to neuronal damage of unknown cause, and alternative strategies, including interference with modifiable risk factors, might be needed to defeat this devastating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30610216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.