Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30610011›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

PepQuery enables fast, accurate, and convenient proteomic validation of novel genomic alterations.

Bo Wen, Xiaojing Wang, Bing Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Open-Source and FAIR Research Software for Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2025
    Review
  12. PepCentric Enables Fast Repository-Scale Proteogenomics Searches.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo WenLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-3150
Xiaojing WangLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Bing ZhangLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

iPGDAC, An Integrative Proteogenomic Data Analysis Center for CPTACU24CA210954 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZHANG, BING · 2016 to 2020
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel or second-generation sequencing-based genomic studies continuously identify new genomic alterations that may lead to novel protein sequences, which are attractive candidates for disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets after proteomic validation. Integrative proteogenomic methods have been developed to use mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics data for such validation. These methods replace the reference sequence database in proteomic database searching with a customized protein database that incorporates sample- or disease-specific sequences derived from DNA or RNA sequencing, thus enabling the identification of novel protein sequences. Although useful, this spectrum-centric approach requires a full evaluation of all possible spectrum-peptide pairs, which is time-consuming, error-prone, and difficult to apply. Here, we present PepQuery, a peptide-centric approach that focuses on only novel DNA or protein sequences of interest. PepQuery allows quick and easy proteomic validation of genomic alterations without customized database construction. We demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of the approach in validating completely novel proteins, novel splice junctions, and single amino acid variants using simulations and experimental data. Notably, enabling unrestricted modification searching in PepQuery reduced false positives by up to 95%. We implemented PepQuery as both web-based and stand-alone applications. The web version provides direct access to more than half a billion MS/MS spectra from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) and other cancer proteomic studies. The stand-alone version supports batch analysis and user-provided MS/MS data. PepQuery will increase the usage of proteogenomics beyond the proteomics community and will broaden the application of proteogenomics in personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticSoftwareGenome, HumanHumansProteomeSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, ProteinProteome

Identifiers

PMID30610011
PMCPMC6396417
OpenAlexW2907677104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.