ArticleMicrobiome2019
Metagenomic, phylogenetic, and functional characterization of predominant endolithic green sulfur bacteria in the coral Isopora palifera.
Article in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Widespread and intron-rich mirusviruses are predicted to reproduce in nuclei of unicellular eukaryotes.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Endolithic algae influence the skeletal microstructure and porosity of reef-building corals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Phototrophic bacteria as potential probiotics for corals.npj biodiversity · 2025Review
- Diversity and dynamics of multiple symbionts contribute to early development of broadcast spawning reef-building coralApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Metabolic interactions between coral animal and endolithic bacterial communities.ISME communications · 2025Article
- The coral microbiome in sickness, in health and in a changing world.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- Bacterial Microbiota ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Microbiomes of a disease-resistant genotype of Acropora cervicornis are resistant to acute, but not chronic, nutrient enrichment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comparative genomic insights into habitat adaptation of coral-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Effects of Ocean Warming on the Underexplored Members of the Coral Microbiome.Integrative and comparative biology · 2022Review
- Genomic view of the diversity and functional role of archaea and bacteria in the skeleton of the reef-building corals Porites lutea and Isopora palifera.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Microbiome Restructuring: Dominant Coral BacteriummSystems · 2022Article
- Neoroseomonas marina sp. nov., Isolated from a Beach Sand.Current microbiology · 2022Article
- Coral-associated nitrogen fixation rates and diazotrophic diversity on a nutrient-replete equatorial reef.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- Potential syntrophic relationship between coral-associatedMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- Detection of Pathogenic and Beneficial Microbes for Roselle Wilt Disease.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Comparative genomics: Dominant coral-bacterium Endozoicomonas acroporae metabolizes dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP).The ISME journal · 2020Article
- Trait-Based Comparison of Coral and Sponge Microbiomes.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndolithic microbes in coral skeletons are known to be a nutrient source for the coral host. In addition to aerobic endolithic algae and Cyanobacteria, which are usually described in the various corals and form a green layer beneath coral tissues, the anaerobic photoautotrophic green sulfur bacteria (GSB) Prosthecochloris is dominant in the skeleton of Isopora palifera. However, due to inherent challenges in studying anaerobic microbes in coral skeleton, the reason for its niche preference and function are largely unknown.
resultsThis study characterized a diverse and dynamic community of endolithic microbes shaped by the availability of light and oxygen. In addition, anaerobic bacteria isolated from the coral skeleton were cultured for the first time to experimentally clarify the role of these GSB. This characterization includes GSB's abundance, genetic and genomic profiles, organelle structure, and specific metabolic functions and activity. Our results explain the advantages endolithic GSB receive from living in coral skeletons, the potential metabolic role of a clade of coral-associated Prosthecochloris (CAP) in the skeleton, and the nitrogen fixation ability of CAP.
conclusionWe suggest that the endolithic microbial community in coral skeletons is diverse and dynamic and that light and oxygen are two crucial factors for shaping it. This study is the first to demonstrate the ability of nitrogen uptake by specific coral-associated endolithic bacteria and shed light on the role of endolithic bacteria in coral skeletons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.