Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30609940›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

The association between socioeconomic status and pandemic influenza: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Svenn-Erik Mamelund, Clare Shelley-Egan, Ole Rogeberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. COVID-19 Testing Factors Among Great Plains American Indians.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Inequalities in the Health Impact of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Piedmont Region, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Air quality during the COVID-19: PMEnvironmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Svenn-Erik MamelundWork Research Institute at OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, PO. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway. Svenn-Erik.Mamelund@oslomet.no.ORCID 0000-0002-3980-3818
Clare Shelley-EganWork Research Institute at OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, PO. Box 4, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
Ole RogebergFrisch Centre, Gaustadalleen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPandemic mortality rates in 1918 and in 2009 were highest among those with the lowest socioeconomic status (SES). Despite this, low SES groups are not included in the list of groups prioritized for pandemic vaccination, and the ambition to reduce social inequality in health does not feature in international and national pandemic preparedness plans. We describe plans for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between SES and pandemic outcomes during the last five pandemics.

methodThe planned review will cover studies of pandemic influenza that report associations between morbidity, hospitalization, or mortality with socioeconomic factors such as education and income. The review will include published studies in the English, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish languages, regardless of geographical location. Relevant records were identified through systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahl, SocIndex, Scopus, and Web of Science. Reference lists of relevant known studies will be screened and experts in the field consulted in order to identify other additional sources. Two investigators will independently screen and select studies, and discrepancies will be resolved through discussion until consensus is reached. Covidence will be used. Results will be summarized narratively and using three meta-analytic strategies: coefficients expressing the difference between the highest and lowest socioeconomic groups reported will be pooled using (a) fixed and random effects meta-analysis where studies involve similar outcome and exposure measures and (b) meta-regression where studies involve similar outcome measures. In addition, we will attempt to use all reported estimates for SES differences in (c) a Bayesian meta-analysis to estimate the underlying SES gradient and how it differs by outcome and exposure measure. DISCUSSION: This study will provide the first systematic review of research on the relation between SES and pandemic outcomes. The findings will be relevant for health policy in helping to assess whether people of low socioeconomic status should be prioritized for vaccines in preparedness plans for pandemic influenza. The review will also contribute to the research literature by providing pooled estimates of effect sizes as inputs into power calculations of future studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 87922.

Indexed as

Educational StatusIncomeInfluenza, HumanPandemicsPovertySocial ClassHealth PolicyHospitalizationHumansInfluenza VaccinesMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicInfluenza VaccinesEducationHospitalizationHousing conditionsIncomeMorbidityMortalityOccupational social classPandemic influenzaPovertySocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID30609940
PMCPMC6318944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.