Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30609917›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

The workload for home visits by German family practitioners: an analysis of regional variation in a cross-sectional study.

Maik Pochert, Karen Voigt, Martin Bortz, Alessa Sattler, Jeannine Schübel, Antje Bergmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maik PochertDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Maik.Pochert@tu-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8143-1053
Karen VoigtDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Martin BortzDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Alessa SattlerDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Jeannine SchübelDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Antje BergmannDepartment of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, home visits account for a considerable workload for many family practitioners, substantial rural-urban disparities are assumable with regards to home visit frequency and duration. Considering the ongoing demographic change and a rural-urban migration a significant regional difference in the provision of care is assumable. There is a lack of reliable data on the current provision of home visits and how their organisational procedures can be ensured in the future. The aim of this study was to describe and assess the average workload of family practitioners during home visits and compare their rural-urban variations.

methodsA cross-sectional study over a period of 12 months was conducted in Saxony as part of the fifth project of the Saxon Epidemiologic Studies in General Practice (SESAM-5). Over a 1-week period, family practitioners documented every home visit and answered questionnaires about sociodemographic, organisational and clinical characteristics. According to common categorizations in empirical studies four regional groups (rural, semi-rural, semi-urban, urban) were analysed and compared by non-parametric tests: Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's, Jonckheere-Terpstra and Mann-Whitney-U. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were carried out using a collection of plausible predictors to assess influences for a high frequency and a long duration of home visits.

resultsThe sample included 3673 home visits conducted by 253 family practitioners. On average, 14.5 home visits were carried out per week with an average duration of almost 28 min. After comparing regional areas, the number and total duration per home visit showed significant differences between the regions: 8.2 h (rural), 7 h (semi-rural), 6.6 h (semi-urban) and 5 h (urban). The regression analyses found that a high frequency of home visits was most likely accomplished in rural regions and a long duration was most likely performed in private homes.

conclusionsWorkload of home visits is strongly associated with the regional location of the practice, leading to rural-urban disparities. Strategies to reduce regional disparities to ensure the future provision of care in the German and comparable health care systems should be discussed, e.g. by financial incentives (short-term), exploiting the potential of delegation (medium-term) and discussing the implementation of substitution (long-term).

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHouse CallsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Rural PopulationUrban PopulationWorkloadCross-sectional studyFamily practitionersHomebound patientsHome visitsRural-urbanWorkload

Identifiers

PMID30609917
PMCPMC6318834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.