Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30609296›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Occupational class and male cancer incidence: Nationwide, multicenter, hospital-based case-control study in Japan.

Masayoshi Zaitsu, Rena Kaneko, Takumi Takeuchi, Yuzuru Sato, Yasuki Kobayashi, Ichiro Kawachi

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Methodological and Practical Challenges in Synthesizing Occupational Cancer Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Occupation and prostate Cancer risk: results from the epidemiological study of prostate cancer (EPICAP).Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Masayoshi ZaitsuDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-355X
Rena KanekoDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takumi TakeuchiDepartment of Urology, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuzuru SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yasuki KobayashiDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro KawachiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about socioeconomic inequalities in male cancer incidence in nonwestern settings. Using the nationwide clinical and occupational inpatient data (1984-2016) in Japan, we performed a multicentered, matched case-control study with 214 123 male cancer cases and 1 026 247 inpatient controls. Based on the standardized national classifications, we grouped patients' longest-held occupational class (blue-collar, service, professional, manager), cross-classified by industrial cluster (blue-collar, service, white-collar). Using blue-collar workers in blue-collar industries as the referent group, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by conditional logistic regression with multiple imputation, matched for age, admission date, and admitting hospital. Smoking and alcohol consumption were additionally adjusted. Across all industries, a reduced risk with higher occupational class (professionals and managers) was observed for stomach and lung cancer. Even after controlling for smoking and alcohol consumption, the reduced odds persisted: OR of managers in white-collar industries was 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.90) for stomach cancer, and OR of managers in white-collar industries was 0.66 (95% CI 0.55-0.79) for lung cancer. In white-collar industries, higher occupational class men tended to have lower a reduced risk for most common types of cancer, with the exception of professionals who showed an excess risk for prostate cancer. We documented socioeconomic inequalities in male cancer incidence in Japan, which could not be explained by smoking and alcohol consumption.

Indexed as

OccupationsAgedAlcohol DrinkingCase-Control StudiesHospitalsHumansIncidenceJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOdds RatioSmokingSocioeconomic Factorscancer incidenceJapanoccupationrisksocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID30609296
PMCPMC6382925
OpenAlexW2907360597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.