Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30609175›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2019

Metabolomic prostate cancer fields in HRMAS MRS-profiled histologically benign tissue vary with cancer status and distance from cancer.

Sarah S Dinges, Lindsey A Vandergrift, Shulin Wu, Yannick Berker, Piet Habbel, Matthias Taupitz, Chin-Lee Wu, Leo L Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative NMR Methods in Metabolomics.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Potential of nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in the study of prostate cancer.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
  8. NMR-based metabolomics: Where are we now and where are we going?Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah S DingesDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lindsey A VandergriftDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shulin WuDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yannick BerkerDivision of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6707-0834
Piet HabbelDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, CCM, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias TaupitzDepartment of Radiology, Charité Medical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Chin-Lee WuDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Leo L ChengDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-7531

Funding

Characterizing Prostate Cancer By ex vivo MRS SignaturesR01CA115746 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHENG, LEO L · 2006 to 2017
$6.4M
Defining Signatures of Breast Cancer Cells by HRMAS MRSR01CA095624 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHENG, LEO L · 2003 to 2006
$1.1M
Development of Metabolomic and Molecular Probes for Prostate Cancer AssessmentR21CA162959 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHENG, LEO L · 2011 to 2012
$418k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095624NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115746NCI NIH HHS R21 CA162959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we review the state of the field of high resolution magic angle spinning MRS (HRMAS MRS)-based cancer metabolomics since its beginning in 2004; discuss the concept of cancer metabolomic fields, where metabolomic profiles measured from histologically benign tissues reflect patient cancer status; and report our HRMAS MRS metabolomic results, which characterize metabolomic fields in prostatectomy-removed cancerous prostates. Three-dimensional mapping of cancer lesions throughout each prostate enabled multiple benign tissue samples per organ to be classified based on distance from and extent of the closest cancer lesion as well as the Gleason score (GS) of the entire prostate. Cross-validated partial least squares-discriminant analysis separations were achieved between cancer and benign tissue, and between cancer tissue from prostates with high (≥4 + 3) and low (≤3 + 4) GS. Metabolomic field effects enabled histologically benign tissue adjacent to cancer to distinguish the GS and extent of the cancer lesion itself. Benign samples close to either low GS cancer or extensive cancer lesions could be distinguished from those far from cancer. Furthermore, a successfully cross-validated multivariate model for three benign tissue groups with varying distances from cancer lesions within one prostate indicates the scale of prostate cancer metabolomic fields. While these findings could, at present, be potentially useful in the prostate cancer clinic for analysis of biopsy or surgical specimens to complement current diagnostics, the confirmation of metabolomic fields should encourage further examination of cancer fields and can also enhance understanding of the metabolomic characteristics of cancer in myriad organ systems. Our results together with the success of HRMAS MRS-based cancer metabolomics presented in our literature review demonstrate the potential of cancer metabolomics to provide supplementary information for cancer diagnosis, staging, and patient prognostication.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsAgedDiscriminant AnalysisHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrincipal Component AnalysisProstatic NeoplasmsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID30609175
PMCPMC7366614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.