Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30608962›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Trends in HIV care cascade engagement among diagnosed people living with HIV in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective, population-based cohort study.

James Wilton, Juan Liu, Ashleigh Sullivan, Beth Rachlis, Alex Marchand-Austin, Madison Giles, Lucia Light, Claudia Rank, Ann N Burchell, Sandra Gardner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A two-day workshop reviewing Canadian provincial and national HIV care cascade indicators, reporting, challenges, and recommendations.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

James WiltonData and Applied Science Impact, Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, Canada.
Juan LiuPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7413-2562
Ashleigh SullivanPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Beth RachlisData and Applied Science Impact, Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, Canada.
Alex Marchand-AustinPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-2037
Madison GilesData and Applied Science Impact, Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, Canada.
Lucia LightData and Applied Science Impact, Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, Canada.
Claudia RankPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Ann N BurchellCentre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Sandra GardnerBaycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Doug SiderPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Mark GilbertClinical Prevention Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada.
Abigail E KrochData and Applied Science Impact, Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, Canada.
Ontario HIV Epidemiology and Surveillance Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe HIV cascade is an important framework for assessing systems of care, but population-based assessment is lacking for most jurisdictions worldwide. We measured cascade indicators over time in a population-based cohort of diagnosed people living with HIV (PLWH) in Ontario, Canada.

methodsWe created a retrospective cohort of diagnosed PLWH using a centralized laboratory database with HIV diagnostic and viral load (VL) test records linked at the individual-level. Individuals enter the cohort with record of a nominal HIV-positive diagnostic test or VL test, and remain unless administratively lost to follow-up (LTFU, >2 consecutive years with no VL test and no VL test in later years). We calculated the annual percent of diagnosed PLWH (cohort individuals not LTFU) between 2000 and 2015 who were in care (≥1 VL test), on ART (as documented on VL test requisition) or virally suppressed (<200 copies/ml). We also calculated time from diagnosis to linkage to care and viral suppression among individuals newly diagnosed with HIV. Analyses were stratified by sex and age. Upper/lower bounds were calculated using alternative indicator definitions.

resultsThe number of diagnosed PLWH increased from 8,859 (8,859-11,389) in 2000 to 16,110 (16,110-17,423) in 2015. Over this 16-year period, the percent of diagnosed PLWH who were: in care increased from 81% (63-81%) to 87% (81-87%), on ART increased from 55% (34-60%) to 81% (70-82%) and virally suppressed increased from 41% (23-46%) to 80% (67-81%). Between 2000 and 2014, the percent of newly diagnosed individuals who linked to care within three months of diagnosis or achieved viral suppression within six months of diagnosis increased from 67% to 82% and from 22% to 42%, respectively. Estimates were generally lower for females and younger individuals. DISCUSSION: HIV cascade indicators among diagnosed PLWH in Ontario improved between 2000 and 2015, but gaps still remain-particularly for younger individuals.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAge FactorsAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIVHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPatient ParticipationRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTime FactorsAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID30608962
PMCPMC6319701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.