Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30608952›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Curare alkaloids from Matis Dart Poison: Comparison with d-tubocurarine in interactions with nicotinic, 5-HT3 serotonin and GABAA receptors.

Ekaterina N Spirova, Igor A Ivanov, Igor E Kasheverov, Denis S Kudryavtsev, Irina V Shelukhina, Alexandra I Garifulina, Lina V Son, Sarah C R Lummis, Gonzalo R Malca-Garcia, Rainer W Bussmann and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Discovery of COVID-19 Inhibitors Targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 Helicase.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2020
    Article
  5. Discovery of COVID-19 Inhibitors Targeting the SARS-CoV2 Nsp13 Helicase.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ekaterina N SpirovaDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6670-8405
Igor A IvanovDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Igor E KasheverovDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Denis S KudryavtsevDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-9193
Irina V ShelukhinaDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-1441
Alexandra I GarifulinaDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Lina V SonDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Sarah C R LummisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gonzalo R Malca-GarciaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6680-4314
Rainer W BussmannMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, La Paz, Bolivia.
Lothar HennigInstitut für Organische Chemie, Fakultät für Chemie und Mineralogie, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Athanassios GiannisInstitut für Organische Chemie, Fakultät für Chemie und Mineralogie, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Victor I TsetlinDepartment of Molecular Neuroimmune signaling, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RULeipzig University · DESechenov University · RUUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR L021676Medical Research Council MR/L021676/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several novel bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids (BBIQAs) have recently been isolated from a Matis tribe arrow poison and shown by two-electrode voltage-clamp to inhibit mouse muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR). Here, using radioligand assay with Aplysia californica AChBP and radioiodinated α-bungarotoxin ([125I]-αBgt), we show that BBIQA1, BBIQA2, and d-tubocurarine (d-TC) have similar affinities to nAChR orthosteric site. However, a competition with [125I]-αBgt for binding to the Torpedo californica muscle-type nAChR revealed that BBIQAs1, 2, and 3 are less potent (IC50s = 26.3, 8.75, and 17.0 μM) than d-TC (IC50 = 0.39 μM), while with α7 nAChR in GH4C1 cells, BBIQA1 was less potent that d-TC (IC50s = 162 μM and 7.77 μM, respectively), but BBIQA2 was similar (IC50 = 5.52 μM). In inhibiting the Ca2+ responses induced by acetylcholine in Neuro2a cells expressing the mouse adult α1β1εδ nAChR or human α7 nAChR, BBIQAs1 and 2 had similar potencies to d-TC (IC50s in the range 0.75-3.08 μM). Our data suggest that BBIQA1 and BBIQA2 can inhibit adult muscle α1β1εδ nAChR by both competitive and noncompetitive mechanisms. Further experiments on neuronal α3β2, α4β2, and α9α10 nAChRs, expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, showed that similar potencies for BBIQAs1, 2, and d-TC. With α3β2γ2 GABAAR currents were almost completely inhibited by d-TC at a high (100 μM) concentration, but BBIQAs1 and 2 were less potent (only 40-50% inhibition), whereas in competition with Alexa Fluor 546-α-cobratoxin for binding to α1β3γ2 GABAAR in Neuro2a cells, d-TC and these analogs had comparable affinities. Especially interesting effects of BBIQAs1 and 2 in comparison with d-TC were observed for 5-HT3AR: BBIQA1 and BBIQA2 were 5- and 87-fold less potent than d-TC (IC50 = 22.63 nM). Thus, our results reveal that these BBIQAs differ from d-TC in their potencies towards certain Cys-loop receptors, and we suggest that understanding the reasons behind this might be useful for future drug design.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzylisoquinolinesCell Line, TumorCurareInhibitory Concentration 50MiceMolecular Docking SimulationOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesPoisonsRadioligand AssayReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3Structure-Activity RelationshipTubocurarineBenzylisoquinolinesCurarePoisonsReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3Tubocurarine

Identifiers

PMID30608952
PMCPMC6319706
OpenAlexW2907268589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.