Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30608539›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2019

Estimating disease prevalence from drug utilization data using the Random Forest algorithm.

Laurentius C J Slobbe, Koen Füssenich, Albert Wong, Hendriek C Boshuizen, Markus M J Nielen, Johan J Polder, Talitha L Feenstra, Hans A M van Oers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identifying diseases in claims data using a machine learning approach - a case from Switzerland.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Prevention and cost control in the German healthcare sector].Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurentius C J SlobbeNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Koen FüssenichNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Albert WongNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Hendriek C BoshuizenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Markus M J NielenNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johan J PolderNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Talitha L FeenstraNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Hans A M van OersNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAggregated claims data on medication are often used as a proxy for the prevalence of diseases, especially chronic diseases. However, linkage between medication and diagnosis tend to be theory based and not very precise. Modelling disease probability at an individual level using individual level data may yield more accurate results.

methodsIndividual probabilities of having a certain chronic disease were estimated using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm. A training set was created from a general practitioners database of 276 723 cases that included diagnosis and claims data on medication. Model performance for 29 chronic diseases was evaluated using Receiver-Operator Curves, by measuring the Area Under the Curve (AUC).

resultsThe diseases for which model performance was best were Parkinson's disease (AUC = .89, 95% CI = .77-1.00), diabetes (AUC = .87, 95% CI = .85-.90), osteoporosis (AUC = .87, 95% CI = .81-.92) and heart failure (AUC = .81, 95% CI = .74-.88). Five other diseases had an AUC >.75: asthma, chronic enteritis, COPD, epilepsy and HIV/AIDS. For 16 of 17 diseases tested, the medication categories used in theory-based algorithms were also identified by our method, however the RF models included a broader range of medications as important predictors.

conclusionData on medication use can be a useful predictor when estimating the prevalence of several chronic diseases. To improve the estimates, for a broader range of chronic diseases, research should use better training data, include more details concerning dosages and duration of prescriptions, and add related predictors like hospitalizations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProbabilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDrug UtilizationFemaleForecastingHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPopulation SurveillancePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID30608539
PMCPMC6660107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.