Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30608433›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Can CT radiomic analysis in NSCLC predict histology and EGFR mutation status?

Subba R Digumarthy, Atul M Padole, Roberto Lo Gullo, Lecia V Sequist, Mannudeep K Kalra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ExplainableJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. MR-based radiomics predictive modelling of EGFR mutation and HER2 overexpression in metastatic brain adenocarcinoma: a two-centre study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Subba R DigumarthyDepartment of Radiology.
Atul M PadoleDepartment of Radiology.
Roberto Lo GulloDepartment of Radiology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
Lecia V SequistDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Mannudeep K KalraDepartment of Radiology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the role of radiomic features in distinguishing squamous and adenocarcinoma subtypes of nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and predict EGFR mutations.Institution Review Board-approved study included chest CT scans of 93 consecutive patients (43 men, 50 women, mean age 60 ± 11 years) with biopsy-proven squamous and adenocarcinoma lung cancers greater than 1 cm. All cancers were evaluated for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The clinical parameters such as age, sex, and smoking history and standard morphology-based CT imaging features such as target lesion longest diameter (LD), longest perpendicular diameter (LPD), density, and presence of cavity were recorded. The radiomics data was obtained using commercial CT texture analysis (CTTA) software. The CTTA was performed on a single image of the dominant lung lesion. The predictive value of clinical history, standard imaging features, and radiomics was assessed with multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.Between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas, ROC analysis showed significant difference in 3/11 radiomic features (entropy, normalized SD, total) [AUC 0.686-0.744, P = .006 to <.0001], 1/3 clinical features (smoking) [AUC 0.732, P = .001], and 2/3 imaging features (LD and LPD) [AUC 0.646-0658, P = .020 to .032]. ROC analysis for probability variables showed higher values for radiomics (AUC 0.800, P < .0001) than clinical (AUC 0.676, P = .017) and standard imaging (AUC 0.708, P < .0001). Between EGFR mutant and wild-type adenocarcinoma, ROC analysis showed significant difference in 2/11 radiomic features (kurtosis, K2) [AUC 0.656-0.713, P = .03 to .003], 1/3 clinical features (smoking) [AUC 0.758, P < .0001]. The combined probability variable for radiomics, clinical and imaging features was higher (AUC 0.890, P < .0001) than independent probability variables.The radiomics evaluation adds incremental value to clinical history and standard imaging features in predicting histology and EGFR mutations.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEntropyErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSoftwareTomography, X-Ray ComputedEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID30608433
PMCPMC6344142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.