Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30608383›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Case report: Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in 2 premature newborns.

Marie Duperril, Stéphanie Rapin, Cécilia Vuillard, Isabelle Rayet, Hugues Patural

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie DuperrilNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, CHU de Saint-Etienne.
Stéphanie RapinNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, CHU de Saint-Etienne.
Cécilia VuillardNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, CHU de Saint-Etienne.
Isabelle RayetNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, CHU de Saint-Etienne.
Hugues PaturalNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, CHU de Saint-Etienne.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRUniversité Jean Monnet · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNeonatal infectious endocarditis (IE) in a healthy heart is rare. The infectious agents most frequently found in newborns are Staphylococcus aureus and fungi. Infection at the site of central intravenous catheter is generally thought to be the cause of this pathology. PATIENT CONCERNS: We present 2 cases of premature newborns whose condition is evolving positively. They presented S aureus endocarditis during their first week of life. DIAGNOSIS: Modified Duke diagnostic criteria-from clinical, echocardiogram and microbiological findings-based on those used for adults, can be used for children and newborns, but the very low prevalence of neonatal IE often delays diagnosis. Diagnosis on the basis of transthoracic heart ultrasound requires an extension report, given the very high embolic risk.

interventionIn the large majority of cases, long-term antibiotic therapy efficaciously treats the infection, although sometimes surgery is necessary. These 2 newborns needed only antibiotic therapy. OUTCOME: Despite the various complications, especially embolic, these 2 children are followed and are doing well. LESSONS: Long-term pediatric heart monitoring combined with prophylactic antibiotics are essential, according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

Indexed as

Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatheter-Related InfectionsCross InfectionEndocarditis, BacterialHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30608383
PMCPMC6344129
OpenAlexW2906771681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.