Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607993›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2019

Strategies to improve research capacity across European general practice: The views of members of EGPRN and Wonca Europe.

Caroline Huas, Davorina Petek, Esperanza Diaz, Miquel A Muñoz-Perez, Peter Torzsa, Claire Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The EGPRN Research Strategy for general practice in Europe.The European journal of general practice · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline Huasa UVSQ, CESP, INSERM , Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud , Villejuif , France.
Davorina Petekc Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , University of Ljubljana , Ljubljana , Slovenia.
Esperanza Diaze Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
Miquel A Muñoz-Perezg Departement de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya , Institut Català de la Salut. IDIAP-Jordi Gol , Barcelona , Spain.
Peter Torzsah Department of Family Medicine , Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine , Budapest , Hungary.
Claire Collinsd Executive Board , European General Practice Research Network , Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of any national healthcare system is highly correlated with the strength of primary care within that system. A strong research basis is essential for a firm and vibrant primary care system. General practitioners (GPs) are at the centre of most primary care systems.

objectivesTo inform on actions required to increase research capacity in general practice, particularly in low capacity countries, we collected information from the members of the European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) and the European World Organization of Family Doctors (Wonca).

methodsA qualitative design including eight semi-structured interviews and two discursive workshops were undertaken with members of EGPRN and Wonca Europe. Appreciative inquiry methods were utilized. Krueger's (1994) framework analysis approach was used to analyse the data.

resultsResearch performance in general practice requires improvements in the following areas: visibility of research; knowledge acquisition; mentoring and exchange; networking and research networks; collaboration with industry, authorities and other stakeholders. Research capacity building (RCB) strategies need to be both flexible and financially supported. Leadership and collaboration are crucial.

conclusionMembers of the GP research community see the clear need for both national and international primary care research networks to facilitate appropriate RCB interventions. These interventions should be multifaceted, responding to needs at different levels and tailored to the context where they are to be implemented.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingCooperative BehaviorEuropeFamily PracticeGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHealth Services ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipPrimary Health Carecapacityfamily medicineGeneral practicenetworkresearch

Identifiers

PMID30607993
PMCPMC6394293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.