Observational studyJournal of neurovirology2019
Headache prevalence and its functional impact among HIV-infected adults in rural Rakai District, Uganda.
Observational study in Journal of neurovirology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Advocacy for patients with headache disorders.eNeurologicalSci · 2023Review
- Burden of headache in a HIV-positive population of sub-Saharan Africa.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022Article
- South African men and women living with HIV have similar distributions of pain sites.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2022Article
- Predictors of chronic opioid therapy in Medicaid beneficiaries with HIV who initiated antiretroviral therapy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Challenges in measuring depression among Ugandan fisherfolk: a psychometric assessment of the Luganda version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Headache is common, but its prevalence and impact in sub-Saharan Africa and especially in HIV+ individuals is relatively unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence and functional impact of headache among HIV-infected (HIV+) adults in a cross-sectional observational cohort study in rural Rakai District, Uganda. Participants completed a sociodemographic survey, depression screen, functional status assessments, and answered the headache screening question, "Do you have headaches?" Participants responding affirmatively were assessed with the ID Migraine tool for diagnosis of migraine and Headache Impact Test-6 to determine functional impact of headache. Characteristics of participants with and without headaches and with and without functional impairment were compared using t tests for continuous variables, chi-square tests for categorical variables, and multivariate logistic regression. Of 333 participants, 51% were males, mean age was 37 (SD 9) years, 94% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and mean CD4 count was 403 (SD 198) cells/μL. Headache prevalence was 28%. Among those reporting headache, 19% met criteria for migraine, 55% reported functional impairment, and 37% reported substantial or severe impact of headache. In multivariate analyses, female sex (odds ratio (OR) 2.58) and depression (OR 2.49) were associated with increased odds and ART (OR 0.33) with decreased odds of headache. Participants with substantial/severe functional impact were more likely to meet criteria for depression (32% vs 9%). In conclusion, headache prevalence in HIV+ rural Ugandans was lower than global averages but still affected more than one quarter of participants and was associated with significant functional impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.