Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607890›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurovirology2019

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for HAND.

Kristen A McLaurin, Rosemarie M Booze, Charles F Mactutus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurovirology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristen A McLaurinProgram in Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Rosemarie M BoozeProgram in Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Charles F MactutusProgram in Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. mactutus@mailbox.sc.edu.

Funding

HIV/COCAINE NEUROTOXICITY IN FEMALESR01DA013137 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BOOZE, ROSEMARIE M, MACTUTUS, CHARLES F. · 2000 to 2021
$7.7M
Maternal HIV: Developmental Neurotoxicity - Administrative SupplementR01HD043680 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BOOZE, ROSEMARIE M, MACTUTUS, CHARLES F. · 2003 to 2016
$2.8M
Progression of Attentional and Executive Function Deficits in HANDR01MH106392 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BOOZE, ROSEMARIE M, MACTUTUS, CHARLES F. · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Neurobiological Mechanisms of Apathy in HANDR01NS100624 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BOOZE, ROSEMARIE M, MACTUTUS, CHARLES F. · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD043680NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013137NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106392NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2007, the nosology for HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) was updated to a primarily neurocognitive disorder. However, currently available diagnostic tools lack the sensitivity and specificity needed for an accurate diagnosis for HAND. Scientists and clinicians, therefore, have been on a quest for an innovative biomarker to diagnose (i.e., diagnostic biomarker) and/or predict (i.e., prognostic biomarker) the progression of HAND in the post-combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) era. The present review examined the utility and challenges of four proposed biomarkers, including neurofilament light (NFL) chain concentration, amyloid (i.e., sAPPα, sAPPβ, amyloid β) and tau proteins (i.e., total tau, phosphorylated tau), resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and prepulse inhibition (PPI). Although significant genotypic differences have been observed in NFL chain concentration, sAPPα, sAPPβ, amyloid β, total tau, phosphorylated tau, and resting-state fMRI, inconsistencies and/or assessment limitations (e.g., invasive procedures, lack of disease specificity, cost) challenge their utility as a diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarker for milder forms of neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in the post-cART era. However, critical evaluation of the literature supports the utility of PPI as a powerful diagnostic biomarker with high accuracy (i.e., 86.7-97.1%), sensitivity (i.e., 89.3-100%), and specificity (i.e., 79.5-94.1%). Additionally, the inclusion of multiple CSF and/or plasma markers, rather than a single protein, may provide a more sensitive diagnostic biomarker for HAND; however, a pressing need for additional research remains. Most notably, PPI may serve as a prognostic biomarker for milder forms of NCI, evidenced by its ability to predict later NCI in higher-order cognitive domains with regression coefficients (i.e., r) greater than 0.8. Thus, PPI heralds an opportunity for the development of a brief, noninvasive diagnostic and promising prognostic biomarker for milder forms of NCI in the post-cART era.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAIDS Dementia ComplexAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsBrainBrain ChemistryBrain MappingDisease ProgressionFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeurofilament ProteinsAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnti-HIV AgentsBiomarkersMAPT protein, humanneurofilament protein LNeurofilament Proteinstau ProteinsDiagnostic biomarkerHIV-1-associated neurocognitive disordersPrepulse inhibitionPrognostic biomarker

Identifiers

PMID30607890
PMCPMC6610810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.