ArticleLa Radiologia medica2019
Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Characterization and Outcome Prediction of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Pooled it
- Delta radiomics: a systematic review.La Radiologia medica · 2021Pooled it
- Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of radiomics predicting response to treatment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Radiomics in prostate cancer imaging for a personalized treatment approach - current aspects of methodology and a systematic review on validated studies.Theranostics · 2021Pooled it
- MRI-based radiomics signature for localized prostate cancer: a new clinical tool for cancer aggressiveness prediction? Sub-study of prospective phase II trial on ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (AIRC IG-13218).European radiology · 2021Trial
- MRI-Derived Biomarkers and Radiomic Signatures for Early, Dose-Dependent Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: An Exploratory Study.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Predicting response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and prognostic outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer using MRI-based radiomics.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Design for Race-Based Prostate Cancer Stage Classification With Multilayer Perceptron: Feature Selection Optimization Approach.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model integrating tumor lesion and periprostatic adipose tissue for predicting bone metastasis in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- AI in Prostate MRI: A Task-Based Review.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Intralesional and perilesional radiomics strategy based on different machine learning for the prediction of international society of urological pathology grade group in prostate cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques for Post-Treatment Evaluation After External Beam Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Narrative Review.Clinics and practice · 2024Review
- From molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer to translational applications: based on multi-omics fusion analysis and intelligent medicine.Health information science and systems · 2024Review
- Article
- Can we predict pathology without surgery? Weighing the added value of multiparametric MRI and whole prostate radiomics in integrative machine learning models.European radiology · 2024Article
- Radiomic Pipelines for Prostate Cancer in External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Review of Methods and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics nomogram for the evaluation of therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in urologic oncology.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Review
- Radiologic Technology Students' Perceptions on Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Radiology.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop different radiomic models based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features and machine learning methods to predict early intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) response, Gleason scores (GS) and prostate cancer (Pca) stages.
methodsThirty-three Pca patients were included. All patients underwent pre- and post-IMRT T2-weighted (T2 W) and apparent diffusing coefficient (ADC) MRI. IMRT response was calculated in terms of changes in the ADC value, and patients were divided as responders and non-responders. A wide range of radiomic features from different feature sets were extracted from all T2 W and ADC images. Univariate radiomic analysis was performed to find highly correlated radiomic features with IMRT response, and a paired t test was used to find significant features between responders and non-responders. To find high predictive radiomic models, tenfold cross-validation as the criterion for feature selection and classification was applied on the pre-, post- and delta IMRT radiomic features, and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics was calculated as model performance value.
resultsOf 33 patients, 15 patients (45%) were found as responders. Univariate analysis showed 20 highly correlated radiomic features with IMRT response (20 ADC and 20 T2). Two and fifteen T2 and ADC radiomic features were found as significant (P-value ≤ 0.05) features between responders and non-responders, respectively. Several cross-combined predictive radiomic models were obtained, and post-T2 radiomic models were found as high predictive models (AUC 0.632) followed by pre-ADC (AUC 0.626) and pre-T2 (AUC 0.61). For GS prediction, T2 W radiomic models were found as more predictive (mean AUC 0.739) rather than ADC models (mean AUC 0.70), while for stage prediction, ADC models had higher prediction performance (mean AUC 0.675).
conclusionsRadiomic models developed by MR image features and machine learning approaches are noninvasive and easy methods for personalized prostate cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30607868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.