ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019
Successful endovascular treatment of chronic renal artery occlusion: a preliminary retrospective case series including 15 patients.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Successful Versus Failed Stenting in Patients With Unilateral Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Occlusion.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Case Report: Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Total Occlusions with Failed Medical Therapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Treatment of Refractory Hypertension with Timely Angioplasty in Total Renal Artery Occlusion with Atrophic Kidney.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Successful Depressor Effect Concomitant with Complete Normalization of High Renin and Aldosterone Profile by Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Angioplasty in a Patient with Acute Exacerbated Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.The American journal of case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate in a retrospective, single-center, case series if percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty/stenting of chronic renal artery occlusion is beneficial to renal function and blood pressure control, which remains controversial.
methodsData from 15 consecutive patients with renal artery stump who underwent successful percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty/stenting only for unilateral chronic renal artery occlusion at our center from January 2007 to February 2018 and completed follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 15 patients, 14 (93.3%) were treated with stenting and 1 with only balloon angioplasty. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula corrected for Chinese, and changes in blood pressure and need for antihypertensive medications were recorded.
resultsAt median 1.5-year (interquartile range 0.5-5.0) follow-up, restenosis rate was 20.0%. Renal function improved or remained stable in 26.7% and 53.3% of patients, respectively, and blood pressure normalized or improved in 13.3% and 40.0% of patients, respectively. Young patients with Takayasu's arteritis or fibromuscular dysplasia appeared to benefit the most from revascularization.
conclusionsIn this preliminary retrospective series of select patients with renal artery stump, endovascular treatment of chronic renal artery occlusion appeared to preserve renal function and improve blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.