Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607746›Full record

ArticlePituitary2019

Evaluation of expression of somatostatin receptor 1, 2, 3, 5 and dopamine D2 receptor in spindle cell oncocytomas of posterior pituitary.

Jiri Soukup, Petra Kasparova, Ales Kohout, Boris Rychly, Veronika Skarkova, Martin Syrucek, Filip Gabalec

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Somatostatin receptors in normal and acromegalic somatotroph cells: the U-turn of the clinician to immunohistochemistry report - a review.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiri SoukupThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Sokolska 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. 2jiri.soukup@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-4386
Petra KasparovaThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Sokolska 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Ales KohoutThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Sokolska 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Boris RychlyCytopathos s.r.o, Kutuzovova 255/23, 831 03, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Veronika SkarkovaDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Simkova 870, 500 03, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Martin SyrucekPathology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, 150 30 Prague 5, Prague, Czech Republic.
Filip Gabalec4th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Sokolska 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZNa Homolce Hospital · CZ

Funding

Pfizer UK ASPIRE WII229983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpindle cell oncocytomas (SCOs) are very rare tumors of the posterior pituitary with potential for locally aggressive behaviour. Their treatment includes surgery and possibly radiotherapy, however other options are lacking. Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are a possible therapeutic target for somatostatin analogues and their expression has been demonstrated recently in closely related pituicytomas, but there are no data about their presence in SCOs.

methodsWe collected five cases of SCO from four patients including one recurrent case. Immunohistochemical detection of TTF1, GFAP, CD68, SST

resultsMean patient age was 61.8 years (range 47-71 years) with male to female ratio 1:1. In one patient, samples from the original tumor and its recurrence 16 years later were assessed. TTF1 was positive in all five cases, no expression of GFAP and CD68 was seen. Immunohistochemical expression of SST

conclusionsWe demonstrated presence of different SST subtypes and D2DR in spindle cell oncocytomas. The most commonly expressed subtype was SST

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdenoma, OxyphilicAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, SomatostatinThyroid Cancer, PapillaryThyroid DiseasesReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Somatostatinsomatostatin receptor 2somatostatin receptor 3somatostatin receptor 5somatostatin receptor type 1Posterior pituitaryPredictive markersSomatostatin receptorsSpindle cell oncocytoma

Identifiers

PMID30607746
OpenAlexW2908239286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.