ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019
Efficacy of a Novel Retrobulbar Extension Shunt to Rescue Eyes with Fibrotic Encapsulated Blebs and Uncontrolled Ocular Hypertension.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary experimental study on a novel device using biomaterial for shunting fibrotic bleb following Ahmed glaucoma valve surgery in dogs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Retrobulbar tube shunt: anterior chamber to back of the eye (A2B) efficacy in glaucomatous eyes with uncontrolled IOP.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRetrobulbar glaucoma shunts are large-bore fenestrated silicone stents that redirect aqueous humor into the retrobulbar space. They were designed to rescue failed standard tube shunts with fibrotic encapsulation in patients with intractable ocular hypertension. This article evaluates longer-term outcomes of a larger population undergoing retrobulbar aqueous redirection.
methodsOutcomes of all retrobulbar shunts were placed among this progressive-entry surgical population over an 8-year interval. Implants were produced by New World Medical (NWM) in Rancho Cucamonga, California, and AJL in Bilbao, Spain. Mean and percentage IOP reduction and medications required were evaluated at annual intervals, along with pre-operative and final visual acuity. Significance of change was assessed by two-tailed paired t-test. Failure was designated as any eye requiring placement of another shunt or diode-cyclophotocoagulation. All data are included in this analysis regardless of outcome.
resultsThirty-five retrobulbar shunts were implanted (18M, 17F; mean 54.3 years; mean follow-up 32.5 months). Short-term AJL shunt performance was comparable to that of the 26 NWM shunts, for which there was longer-term follow-up. Three shunts (9%) failed: Two eyes required diode at 6 months, one another standard shunt after > 2 years. Preoperative medications averaged 2.6, reduced to 0.4-0.75 medications at each annual assessment (P < 0.0001). IOP was substantially reduced (by 53-57% from mean baseline 29.9-32.5 mmHg to 16.4-18.4 mmHg; P < 0.0008) at every annual follow-up. Visual acuity remained stable (baseline mean VA 0.27, final VA 0.30; P = 0.68).
conclusionRetrobulbar extension shunts can convert tube shunt failures, with high success rate, to eyes with IOP control comparable to successful primary filtration surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30607552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.