Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607532›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2019

Stringent fluid management might help to prevent postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure.

Fabian Grass, Basile Pache, Fabio Butti, Josep Solà, Dieter Hahnloser, Nicolas Demartines, Martin Hübner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07144969 (Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07144969 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo Hospital LahoreRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsIleostomy Closure, Gum Chewing, Honey, Postoperative RecoveryArmsHoney, gum chewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian GrassDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Basile PacheDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-7345
Fabio ButtiDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Josep SolàCentre Suisse d'Electronique et de Microtechnique (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Dieter HahnloserDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. demartines@chuv.ch.
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aimed to analyze the impact of perioperative fluid management on postoperative ileus (POI) after loop ileostomy closure.

methodsConsecutive loop ileostomy closures over a 6-year period (May 2011-May 2017) were included. Main outcomes were POI, defined as time to first stool beyond POD 3, and postoperative complications of any grade. Critical fluid management-related thresholds including postoperative weight gain were identified through receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis and tested in a multivariable analysis.

resultsOf 238 included patients, 33 (14%) presented with POI; overall complications occurred in 91 patients (38%). 1.7 L IV fluids at postoperative day (POD) 0 was determined a critical threshold for POI (area under ROC curve (AUROC), 0.64), yielding a negative predictive value (NPV) of 93%. Further, a critical cutoff for a postoperative weight gain of 1.2 kg at POD 2 was identified (AUROC, 0.65; NPV, 95%). Multivariable analysis confirmed POD 0 fluids of > 1.7 L (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.4-15.3; p = 0.01) and POD 2 weight gain of > 1.2 kg (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1-9.4; p = 0.046) as independent predictors for POI.

conclusionsPerioperative fluid administration of > 1.7 L and POD 2 weight gain of > 1.2 kg represent critical thresholds for POI after loop ileostomy closure.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyIntraoperative CareAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIleostomyIleusLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectal DiseasesROC CurveWeight GainComplicationsFluid managementLoop ileostomyPostoperative ileusWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID30607532
OpenAlexW2907690002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.