ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2019
[Detection of malnutrition in geriatric trauma patients : A reassessment].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Evaluation and risk assessment of geriatric ankle fractures? : What must be considered?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, Controversies, and Dilemmas of Perioperative Nutritional Risk/Malnutrition: A Narrative Literature Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Review
- Nutritional Assessment in Older Adults : MNA® 25 years of a Screening Tool and a Reference Standard for Care and Research; What Next?The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveMalnutrition in geriatric trauma patients is associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality and is therefore a key risk factor. The assessment of the affected patients plays an important role in improving the outcome of this growing patient group. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn 2016 a questionnaire was sent to 571 departments specialized in traumatology and orthopedics throughout Germany. The following were recorded: level of care, expertise in geriatric trauma, nutrition-based screening procedures and nutritional ward round procedures.
resultsThe response rate was 57% (n = 325) and closely reflected the treatment reality in Germany with respect to the level of care (superregional, regional or local trauma center and those without special qualifications). In 14% (n = 45) the participants were German Society for Trauma Surgery(DGU)-certified centers for age-related traumatology, while a further 5% (n = 15) were in the process of certification. The nutritional status was assessed in 56% (n = 181) of the clinics. Most frequently used was the body mass index (74%) followed by the mini nutritional assessment (30%), laboratory parameters (29%) and nutritional risk screening 2002 (19%). Some additional methods were specified. In approximately half of the departments nutritional ward rounds took place in regular wards (50%) and intensive care units (57%). DISCUSSION: The high response rate of this study seems to show the particular interest for malnutrition in geriatric trauma patients. This is reflected in an increase in the participating clinics compared to past surveys and also the more regularly performed assessment of nutritional status and implementation of nutritional visits.
conclusionThe establishment of suitable and time-effective screening instruments and their implementation are still a challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.