Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30607461›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019

[Bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery in Germany 2017 : Results of a survey among members of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery].

A Buia, S Post, H J Buhr, E Hanisch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Preoperative bowel conditioning].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A BuiaKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Röntgenstr. 20, 63225, Langen, Deutschland. a.buia@asklepios.com.
S PostChirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland.
H J BuhrDeutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland.
E HanischKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Röntgenstr. 20, 63225, Langen, Deutschland.
Asklepios Klinik Langen · DEDeutsche Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe morbidity after colorectal resection is still high. Perioperative i.v. antibiotic administration has become established as the standard to decrease the wound infection rate. An ongoing discussion is the status of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation. There seems to be evidence that mechanical bowel preparation in combination with administration of oral non-resorbable antibiotics significantly decreases the rate of anastomotic leakage and postoperative wound infections.

objectiveIn order to obtain an overview on the state of preoperative preparation before elective colorectal surgery in Germany, a survey was initiated among the members of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn March 2017 the 5200 members of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) received via email a link to an online survey on bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery.

resultsA total of 557 colleagues answered the questionnaire online. Mechanical bowel preparation with orthograde lavage was the predominant method for bowel preparation prior to colon resection in over 50%. In rectal surgery with primary anastomosis and planned protective stoma, mechanical bowel preparation with orthograde lavage dominated with 76.5%. An oral antibiotic administration alone and in combination with mechanical bowel preparation for colon resection was used by less than 10% and 2%, respectively and ca. 11 % for rectal surgery both with and without mechanical bowel preparation.

conclusionIn contrast to the evidence in the current literature to carry out preoperative mechanical preparation of the bowel in combination with an oral antibiotic administration prior to colorectal resection, in practice these recommendations have not become established among the participants of this survey.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryElective Surgical ProceduresSurgical Wound InfectionGermanyHumansPreoperative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBowel preparation in GermanyElective colon resectionElective rectal resectionPreoperative bowel preparationPreoperative oral antibiotics

Identifiers

PMID30607461
OpenAlexW2906736327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.